An appraiser can find only three sales in a rural market, and the best one closed 14 months ago. What is the proper course?
Correct Answer
B) Use it with a supported market-conditions adjustment and explain
Why this is correct: In limited-data markets, appraisers must use available sales with appropriate adjustments. A 14-month-old sale can be used if a time adjustment is supported by market evidence (e.g., price trends) and fully explained in the report. Why the other choices are wrong: 'Reject the assignment for lack of data' is not required if reasonable adjustments can be made. 'Use it as-is, since rural prices rarely move' assumes no market change without evidence. 'Substitute a current listing at its full asking price' is improper; listings are not closed sales. Exam tip: Older comps require a supported time adjustment and clear disclosure.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option B is correct because using the sale with a supported market conditions adjustment and explaining the choice addresses both the data limitation and the disclosure duty. The adjustment converts the fourteen-month-old price into an indication as of the effective date, and the support behind it is what makes the conversion credible. Explaining the limited data set also lets the intended user weigh the conclusion appropriately. This is the ordinary and accepted way to appraise in thin markets.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Reject the assignment for lack of data
Scarce data is a normal condition in rural work rather than grounds for declining, and the scope of work rule contemplates expanding the search in time and geography. If every thin market defeated an assignment, large parts of the country could not be appraised. Declining would also be inconsistent with the appraiser's ability to produce credible results using recognized techniques for limited data.
Option C: Use it as-is, since rural prices rarely move
Assuming rural prices do not move is an unsupported generalization, and rural markets have experienced sharp movements driven by commodity prices, interest rates, recreational demand, and migration. Using a fourteen-month-old sale at face value silently assumes a zero adjustment, which is an adjustment made without support. If the analysis genuinely indicates no change, that conclusion must be demonstrated rather than presumed.
Option D: Substitute a current listing at its full asking price instead
A listing at full asking price is an upper bound, not a substitute for a closed sale, because no buyer has agreed to that number. Substituting it would import a seller's aspiration into the grid as though it were a transaction. Listings are useful for bracketing and for gauging current supply, but they cannot replace verified sales as primary evidence.
Adjust and explain
Thin data is a reason to work harder, not to stop. Bring the old sale forward with a supported time adjustment, then tell the reader exactly what you did and why.
How to use: When a stem describes limited or dated data, choose the option that uses the evidence with a supported adjustment plus disclosure. Rejecting, ignoring, or substituting are all shortcuts.
Exam Tip
A zero adjustment is still an adjustment. If you decide the market did not move, that conclusion needs support just as a positive adjustment would.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Using dated sales without a time adjustment
- -Presuming no market movement without evidence
- -Substituting listings for closed sales in the grid
- -Failing to disclose the limited data available in the market
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This tests how to work in a data-poor market without either abandoning the assignment or pretending the data problem does not exist. Rural markets generate few transactions, so the choice is rarely between good comparables and better ones; it is between older or more distant sales analyzed carefully and no analysis at all. A sale fourteen months old is usable, but it reflects conditions at its own date, so it requires a market conditions adjustment supported by evidence such as resales of the same properties, matched pairs separated in time, trends in median price per square foot with adequate counts, or broader county-level indices used cautiously. The scope of work rule requires the appraiser to do what is necessary for credible results, which in thin markets means widening the search in time or geography and disclosing what was done. The second obligation is explanatory: the report must let the reader see why the older sale was used and how the adjustment was derived.
Background Knowledge
You need the scope of work rule's requirement that the appraiser do what is necessary for credible results, and the recognized ways to derive market conditions adjustments, including resales, matched pairs over time, and trend analysis. You should also understand the evidence hierarchy of closed sales, pending contracts, and listings, and the obligation to disclose data limitations in the report.
Real-World Application
Appraising an acreage property with only three sales available, you extract a market conditions trend from two resales in the county and a broader price-per-acre series, apply it to the fourteen-month-old sale, and explain in the report that the limited data set led you to widen the search radius and time frame.
More Sales Comparison Questions
Excess land differs from surplus land in that excess land:
A paired sales analysis reveals that homes with stainless-steel appliances sell for $2,100 more than identical homes with standard appliances — but only when the homes are priced below $350,000. In the subject’s neighborhood, median sale price is $410,000. What is the appraiser’s obligation regarding the $2,100 appliance adjustment?
GLA differs by 210 sq ft between subject and comparable. Paired sales support $65 per sq ft of living area. The line adjustment is:
Paired sales are drawn from transactions six months apart in a stable market. The time adjustment needed is:
The most appropriate unit of comparison is determined by:
A comparable superior to the subject in every adjusted category should produce an indication that is:
Three sales support $520,000; the borrower's purchase contract is $505,000. May the appraisal conclude above the contract price?
A comparable sold for $300,000 with the seller carrying a loan 2 points below market, a benefit worth $8,000. What is its cash-equivalent price?
Why is a foreclosure sale generally a poor comparable in a stable market?
A comparable sold 8 months ago for $250,000 in a market appreciating 6% per year. What is the time-adjusted price?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam