A sale in which the buyer assumed the seller's below-market loan requires:
Correct Answer
D) Cash equivalency analysis of the financing benefit
Why this is correct: The correct answer, 'Cash equivalency analysis of the financing benefit,' is required because a below-market loan assumption provides a financing benefit to the buyer, which inflates the sale price above the property's cash-equivalent market value. The sales comparison grid must reflect the real estate's value separate from any financing concessions, so the benefit's monetary value must be estimated and removed. Why the other choices are wrong: 'No adjustment, since assumptions are common' is wrong because commonality does not negate the need to isolate the real estate's value. 'Exclusion of the sale from the comparable set' is wrong because the sale can be used after proper adjustment. 'An upward adjustment equal to the loan balance' is wrong because the adjustment is for the benefit's value, not the loan balance. Exam tip: For any sale with atypical financing (below- or above-market), think 'cash equivalency' to isolate the real property value.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Cash equivalency analysis of the financing benefit is exactly the required treatment, because the distortion arises from financing terms and the remedy is to restate the price to typical terms. It also correctly frames the task as an analysis rather than a fixed deduction, since the size of the benefit must be computed from the rate spread, the balance, and the remaining term. Once restated, the sale is fully usable. The adjustment belongs among the transactional adjustments, applied before any physical or locational comparison.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: No adjustment, since assumptions are common
How common a practice is has no bearing on whether it distorted a particular price. In markets where rates have risen sharply, assumable low-rate loans are both common and highly valuable, which makes the distortion larger rather than more excusable. Frequency of an arrangement is not evidence that it is priced at zero.
Option B: Exclusion of the sale from the comparable set
Exclusion is unwarranted when the distortion is identifiable and quantifiable, and a rate spread on a known balance and term is readily quantified. Discarding such sales would remove much of the available data in a market where assumptions are prevalent. Exclusion is reserved for distortions that cannot be verified or measured.
Option C: An upward adjustment equal to the loan balance
The loan balance is the amount of debt outstanding, not the value of the interest rate advantage, and the two bear no fixed relationship. A $200,000 assumable balance at half a point under market is worth very little, while the same balance at four points under market is worth a great deal. The adjustment is also downward rather than upward, since the buyer paid extra for the benefit.
Price the Loan, Not the Balance
The value of favorable financing is the rate advantage over time, never the size of the loan. Compute the payment difference, discount it, and subtract. A big loan at market rate is worth nothing extra.
How to use: When a stem mentions an assumed, carried, or bought-down loan, answer cash equivalency. Then set the direction by asking who gained, and reject any option that keys the adjustment to the loan balance.
Exam Tip
Cash equivalency questions are usually decided by direction and by what gets measured. Buyer advantage means subtract, and what is measured is the benefit, never the balance.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Adjusting by the loan balance rather than the value of the rate advantage
- -Adding the benefit instead of subtracting it
- -Discounting over the full amortization term when the buyer's realistic hold is much shorter
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
Assuming an existing loan at a rate below current market hands the buyer a stream of payments smaller than a new loan would require, and in a negotiated transaction that advantage gets bid into the price. The nominal price therefore blends the value of the real estate with the value of the financing, and cash equivalency analysis separates them. The technique measures the advantage by projecting the payment differential between the assumed loan and a market-rate loan of comparable term, then discounting that differential stream to present value, sometimes truncating at the buyer's realistic holding period rather than the full amortization. The resulting figure is deducted from the nominal price to produce a cash-equivalent price, which is what enters the grid. Direction is set by who benefited: favorable financing to the buyer means the buyer paid extra, so the adjustment comes out. The same method in reverse handles onerous terms that suppressed a price.
Background Knowledge
You need the market value assumption of financing typical for the area, the mechanics of cash equivalency, and the standard sequence placing financing terms among the transactional adjustments before property adjustments. You should also be able to value a below-market loan by discounting the payment differential over the expected holding period.
Real-World Application
An appraiser in a market where rates rose several points finds a comparable where the buyer assumed a low-rate mortgage. She discounts the payment differential over a realistic seven-year holding period rather than the full remaining term, deducts the result, and shows the computation so a reviewer can reproduce it.
More Sales Comparison Questions
Excess land differs from surplus land in that excess land:
A paired sales analysis reveals that homes with stainless-steel appliances sell for $2,100 more than identical homes with standard appliances — but only when the homes are priced below $350,000. In the subject’s neighborhood, median sale price is $410,000. What is the appraiser’s obligation regarding the $2,100 appliance adjustment?
GLA differs by 210 sq ft between subject and comparable. Paired sales support $65 per sq ft of living area. The line adjustment is:
Paired sales are drawn from transactions six months apart in a stable market. The time adjustment needed is:
The most appropriate unit of comparison is determined by:
A comparable superior to the subject in every adjusted category should produce an indication that is:
Three sales support $520,000; the borrower's purchase contract is $505,000. May the appraisal conclude above the contract price?
A comparable sold for $300,000 with the seller carrying a loan 2 points below market, a benefit worth $8,000. What is its cash-equivalent price?
Why is a foreclosure sale generally a poor comparable in a stable market?
A comparable sold 8 months ago for $250,000 in a market appreciating 6% per year. What is the time-adjusted price?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam