EstatePass
sales-comparison-approachmedium

A comparable sold 8 months ago for $250,000 in a market appreciating 6% per year. What is the time-adjusted price?

Correct Answer

A) $260,000, using eight months of appreciation

Why this is correct: In an appreciating market, adjust the old sale price forward. Annual rate 6% over 8 months = (6% × 8/12) = 4%. $250,000 × 1.04 = $260,000. Why the other choices are wrong: '$265,000, applying the full annual rate' uses 6% for 8 months. '$240,000, discounting for the older sale' mistakenly reduces the price. '$254,000, applying appreciation for four months' uses an incorrect time period. Exam tip: Market conditions adjustment brings the comparable to the effective date; in rising markets, add.

Answer Options
A
$260,000, using eight months of appreciation
B
$265,000, applying the full annual rate
C
$240,000, discounting for the older sale
D
$254,000, applying appreciation for four months

Why This Is the Correct Answer

At 6 percent per year the monthly rate is 0.5 percent, so eight months gives 4 percent and $250,000 × 1.04 = $260,000.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option B: $265,000, applying the full annual rate

$265,000 applies the full annual 6 percent for a sale only eight months old, overstating the adjustment.

Option C: $240,000, discounting for the older sale

$240,000 adjusts downward, which reverses the direction. An appreciating market brings older sales upward.

Option D: $254,000, applying appreciation for four months

$254,000 reflects roughly four months of appreciation rather than the eight months elapsed.

Rate Times Elapsed Time

Rate Times Elapsed Time. Eight months of a six percent year is four percent, not six.

How to use: Convert the annual rate to a monthly one first, then multiply by the months elapsed.

Exam Tip

The rate should be derived from evidence such as resales or paired sales over time, and the derivation belongs in the report.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • -Applying the full annual rate regardless of elapsed time
  • -Adjusting downward for an older sale in a rising market
  • -Assuming a rate without deriving it from evidence

Concept Deep Dive

Analysis

A market conditions adjustment brings a past sale forward to the effective date, and the calculation must use the elapsed time rather than the annual rate as quoted. At 6 percent per year the monthly rate is 0.5 percent, so eight months produces 4 percent — $250,000 × 1.04 = $260,000. The distractors correspond to three specific errors: applying the full annual rate regardless of elapsed time, adjusting downward as though an older sale should be discounted rather than brought forward, and using the wrong number of months. The direction is worth fixing in mind. In an appreciating market a sale from the past occurred at lower price levels, so it is adjusted upward to state what it would bring today. A depreciating market reverses the sign. In practice the rate itself is derived from evidence — resales of the same property, paired sales over time, or a trend in median prices — rather than assumed, and the derivation belongs in the report.

Background Knowledge

Market conditions adjustments convert a past sale price to the effective date using a rate derived from market evidence, applied for the elapsed time between sale and effective date.

Real-World Application

An appraiser adjusts a sale from eight months earlier upward by 4 percent to $260,000, citing repeat sales evidence supporting the 6 percent annual rate.

market conditions adjustmenttime adjustmentappreciationelapsed timeeffective date
Was this explanation helpful?

More sales-comparison-approach Questions

Excess land differs from surplus land in that excess land:

A subject property has a 3-car attached garage. The appraiser locates two valid paired sales: Sale 1 (with 3-car garage) sold for $512,000; Sale 2 (with 2-car garage) sold for $497,600. Both properties are otherwise identical — same age, quality, GLA, lot size, and neighborhood — and sold 5 days apart in a balanced market. The appraiser also confirms via public records and listing photos that no other functional or physical differences exist. What is the indicated contributory value of the *third* garage stall?

The most appropriate unit of comparison is determined by:

An appraiser analyzes three paired sales to isolate the effect of a fireplace. In Pair 1, the property with a fireplace sold for $12,000 more; in Pair 2, $10,500 more; and in Pair 3, $13,500 more. All pairs are highly similar and recent. The appraiser selects $12,000 as the final adjustment. Which principle best supports this selection?

A paired sales analysis yields an adjustment of −$15,000 for a property located on a busy arterial street. Later, the appraiser discovers that all three paired properties with arterial exposure also had 20% smaller lots than their non-arterial counterparts — a difference not initially controlled for. What is the most appropriate action per USPAP?

An appraiser identifies two comparable sales that are identical in all respects except that Sale #1 has a finished basement (1,200 sq ft) and sold for $432,000, while Sale #2 has an unfinished basement of the same size and sold for $408,000. Both sales occurred within three weeks of each other in a stable market. The appraiser intends to apply a per-square-foot adjustment for basement finish to the subject property, which has a 1,000 sq ft finished basement. What is the appropriate paired-sales-derived adjustment amount per square foot for a finished basement?

Three sales support $520,000; the borrower's purchase contract is $505,000. May the appraisal conclude above the contract price?

An appraiser develops a $3,200 adjustment for a fireplace based on a single paired sale. The subject has a fireplace; Comparable A does not. The appraiser applies +$3,200 to Comparable A. Later, the appraiser identifies a second pair showing a $4,600 fireplace contribution. The appraiser replaces the original adjustment with $3,900 — the simple average — and applies it to Comparable A. What is the appropriate USPAP-compliant action regarding the adjustment amount?

A comparable sold for $300,000 with the seller carrying a loan 2 points below market, a benefit worth $8,000. What is its cash-equivalent price?

Three comparables adjust to $412,000 (gross adj. 5%), $405,000 (gross adj. 22%), and $410,000 (gross adj. 8%). What is the best-supported value conclusion?

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing