EstatePass
sales-comparison-approacheasy

The subject sits just inside a top-rated school attendance zone; an otherwise perfect comparable sits two blocks away, outside it. That comparable:

Correct Answer

C) Is usable with a supported location adjustment for the boundary

Why this is correct: A comparable sale outside a desirable school zone can still be used if a supported adjustment is made for the location difference. The adjustment should be based on market evidence (e.g., paired sales analysis) quantifying the premium for being inside the zone. Why the other choices are wrong: "Is unusable at any adjustment amount" is too restrictive; comparables can be adjusted. "Needs no location adjustment at all, since it sits physically nearby" ignores that school boundaries create significant value differences despite proximity. "Should be adjusted using its lower tax bill" confuses tax impact with market value impact. Exam tip: Location adjustments are often needed for non-physical differences like school zones, even for nearby sales.

Answer Options
A
Is unusable at any adjustment amount
B
Needs no location adjustment at all, since it sits physically nearby
C
Is usable with a supported location adjustment for the boundary
D
Should be adjusted using its lower tax bill

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Why this is correct: A comparable sale outside a desirable school zone can still be used if a supported adjustment is made for the location difference. The adjustment should be based on market evidence (e.g., paired sales analysis) quantifying the premium for being inside the zone. Why the other choices are wrong: "Is unusable at any adjustment amount" is too restrictive; comparables can be adjusted. "Needs no location adjustment at all, since it sits physically nearby" ignores that school boundaries create significant value differences despite proximity. "Should be adjusted using its lower tax bill" confuses tax impact with market value impact. Exam tip: Location adjustments are often needed for non-physical differences like school zones, even for nearby sales.

Was this explanation helpful?

More sales-comparison-approach Questions

Excess land differs from surplus land in that excess land:

A subject property has a 3-car attached garage. The appraiser locates two valid paired sales: Sale 1 (with 3-car garage) sold for $512,000; Sale 2 (with 2-car garage) sold for $497,600. Both properties are otherwise identical β€” same age, quality, GLA, lot size, and neighborhood β€” and sold 5 days apart in a balanced market. The appraiser also confirms via public records and listing photos that no other functional or physical differences exist. What is the indicated contributory value of the *third* garage stall?

The most appropriate unit of comparison is determined by:

An appraiser analyzes three paired sales to isolate the effect of a fireplace. In Pair 1, the property with a fireplace sold for $12,000 more; in Pair 2, $10,500 more; and in Pair 3, $13,500 more. All pairs are highly similar and recent. The appraiser selects $12,000 as the final adjustment. Which principle best supports this selection?

A paired sales analysis yields an adjustment of βˆ’$15,000 for a property located on a busy arterial street. Later, the appraiser discovers that all three paired properties with arterial exposure also had 20% smaller lots than their non-arterial counterparts β€” a difference not initially controlled for. What is the most appropriate action per USPAP?

An appraiser identifies two comparable sales that are identical in all respects except that Sale #1 has a finished basement (1,200 sq ft) and sold for $432,000, while Sale #2 has an unfinished basement of the same size and sold for $408,000. Both sales occurred within three weeks of each other in a stable market. The appraiser intends to apply a per-square-foot adjustment for basement finish to the subject property, which has a 1,000 sq ft finished basement. What is the appropriate paired-sales-derived adjustment amount per square foot for a finished basement?

Three sales support $520,000; the borrower's purchase contract is $505,000. May the appraisal conclude above the contract price?

An appraiser develops a $3,200 adjustment for a fireplace based on a single paired sale. The subject has a fireplace; Comparable A does not. The appraiser applies +$3,200 to Comparable A. Later, the appraiser identifies a second pair showing a $4,600 fireplace contribution. The appraiser replaces the original adjustment with $3,900 β€” the simple average β€” and applies it to Comparable A. What is the appropriate USPAP-compliant action regarding the adjustment amount?

A comparable sold for $300,000 with the seller carrying a loan 2 points below market, a benefit worth $8,000. What is its cash-equivalent price?

Three comparables adjust to $412,000 (gross adj. 5%), $405,000 (gross adj. 22%), and $410,000 (gross adj. 8%). What is the best-supported value conclusion?

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing