Which unit of comparison is most commonly applied to a downtown commercial site?
Correct Answer
A) Price per square foot of land area
Why this is correct: Price per square foot of land area is the most common unit of comparison for a downtown commercial site. Value in such markets is closely tied to the buildable area, which is a function of the land's square footage and zoning allowances (like floor-area ratio). This unit provides a precise measure for comparing small, valuable urban parcels. Why the other choices are wrong: "Price per acre of the total parcel" is too coarse a measure for typically small downtown lots. "Price per dwelling unit permitted" is used for residential land, not commercial. "Price per front foot of the lot" is historically used for retail properties where frontage is critical, but for general downtown commercial use, square footage is more comprehensive. Exam tip: The unit of comparison should reflect what drives value in that specific market.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Why this is correct: Price per square foot of land area is the most common unit of comparison for a downtown commercial site. Value in such markets is closely tied to the buildable area, which is a function of the land's square footage and zoning allowances (like floor-area ratio). This unit provides a precise measure for comparing small, valuable urban parcels. Why the other choices are wrong: "Price per acre of the total parcel" is too coarse a measure for typically small downtown lots. "Price per dwelling unit permitted" is used for residential land, not commercial. "Price per front foot of the lot" is historically used for retail properties where frontage is critical, but for general downtown commercial use, square footage is more comprehensive. Exam tip: The unit of comparison should reflect what drives value in that specific market.
More Land/Site Questions
Under which condition is the land residual technique most applicable?
Why can the same physical parcel carry different values in two assignments?
In a built-up area where no vacant land has sold for years, which approach to site value is the usual fallback?
How is entrepreneurial profit treated in the subdivision development method?
A land comparable sold 18 months ago in a market rising about 4 percent a year. What adjustment direction applies?
Why does a developer's required profit rise for a longer subdivision project?
How does holding cost enter the valuation of land bought for future development?
Excess land is best described as land that has which characteristic?
Plottage value arises in which of the following situations?
Which of the following is an off-site improvement rather than a site improvement?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
