A site's zoning permits a use that the market does not currently demand. What follows?
Correct Answer
D) The use fails the financial feasibility test for now
Why this is correct: Highest and best use (HBU) analysis applies four tests in sequence: legal permissibility, physical possibility, financial feasibility, and maximum productivity. A use that is legally permitted (zoning) but lacks current market demand fails the financial feasibility test. HBU is based on what is reasonably probable and financially viable as of the appraisal date, not merely what is allowed by law. Why the other choices are wrong: "The permitted use is the highest and best use by law" confuses legal permissibility with the full HBU conclusion; it is only the first test. "The site must be rezoned before it can be appraised" is incorrect; an appraisal is based on existing conditions, including current zoning. "The zoning should be disregarded in the analysis" is wrong; zoning is a critical constraint and must be considered. Exam tip: Remember the four HBU tests in order: Legal, Physical, Financial, Maximum. A use must pass all four.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option D is correct because a legally permitted use without market demand fails the financial feasibility test at the effective date. Feasibility asks whether the completed project would produce sufficient value to justify its cost, including a competitive entrepreneurial profit, and absent demand the answer is no. The analysis then moves to whatever use does clear the screen, which in a thin market may be holding the land for future development. The temporal qualifier is essential, since a use failing today may pass in a later market.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: The permitted use is the highest and best use by law
Zoning establishes what is legally permissible, which is the first screen rather than the conclusion, and permission alone never makes a use the highest and best. If it did, the remaining three tests would serve no purpose and every parcel's highest and best use could be read off the zoning map. Markets routinely leave permitted development unbuilt for years because demand does not support it.
Option B: The site must be rezoned before it can be appraised
Appraisers value property as it exists under current zoning and are not obliged to wait for a change. Where a rezoning is reasonably probable, the appraiser may consider it with appropriate support and disclosure, but nothing prevents completing the assignment under existing regulation. Refusing to appraise until the zoning changes misunderstands the appraiser's role entirely.
Option C: The zoning should be disregarded in the analysis
Zoning is a controlling legal constraint and forms the first screen of the analysis, so it can never be disregarded. Ignoring it would allow a conclusion of a use that could not lawfully be built. The correct treatment is to acknowledge what zoning permits and then test those permitted uses against demand.
Permitted is not profitable
Zoning writes the guest list; the market decides who actually shows up. A use can be fully invited and still fail because nobody wants it yet.
How to use: When a stem pairs a permitted use with absent demand, go straight to the feasibility screen. The phrase for now in an answer choice signals the correct time-bound reasoning.
Exam Tip
Anchor every highest and best use conclusion to the effective date. Feasibility is a snapshot, not a permanent property of the site.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Treating the zoned use as automatically the highest and best use
- -Concluding a use that is speculative rather than reasonably probable
- -Overlooking that holding for future development can be the highest and best use
- -Assuming a rezoning without support when a probable change would affect value
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This tests the financial feasibility screen and the difference between legal permission and market demand. Zoning tells you what may be built; it says nothing about whether anyone would buy or lease the result. A use that clears the legal and physical screens but faces no current demand cannot generate a return sufficient to justify the cost of development, so it fails financial feasibility and drops out of the analysis. Highest and best use must be reasonably probable as of the effective date, which anchors the conclusion to present market conditions rather than to what the zoning contemplates or what might happen someday. The qualifier for now matters, because feasibility is time-dependent: a use may become feasible later as demand builds, and in some assignments the appropriate conclusion is that the site's highest and best use is to hold it for future development, which is itself a use.
Background Knowledge
You need the four tests of highest and best use, applied in sequence, and the requirement that the conclusion be reasonably probable as of the effective date. You also need to know that financial feasibility asks whether a use produces sufficient return to justify development cost plus entrepreneurial profit, that holding land for future development can itself be the highest and best use, and that a reasonably probable zoning change may be considered with support and disclosure.
Real-World Application
A parcel is zoned for a hotel in a submarket with declining occupancy and no financing available for new keys. You conclude hotel development is not currently feasible, determine that holding the land for future development is the highest and best use, and support the conclusion with occupancy trends and the absence of construction starts.
More Land/Site Questions
Under which condition is the land residual technique most applicable?
Why can the same physical parcel carry different values in two assignments?
In a built-up area where no vacant land has sold for years, which approach to site value is the usual fallback?
How is entrepreneurial profit treated in the subdivision development method?
A land comparable sold 18 months ago in a market rising about 4 percent a year. What adjustment direction applies?
Why does a developer's required profit rise for a longer subdivision project?
How does holding cost enter the valuation of land bought for future development?
Excess land is best described as land that has which characteristic?
Plottage value arises in which of the following situations?
Which of the following is an off-site improvement rather than a site improvement?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam