In an otherwise unchanged development cash-flow model, additional holding cash outflows are not already included in another cost or rate. What effect do those additional outflows have on the present residual available for land?
Correct Answer
C) It reduces what a buyer can pay for the land now
With other inputs held constant, additional supported holding cash outflows reduce the present residual available for land. Model taxes, insurance, financing and required return consistently so the same expense or return is not counted twice. Costs are not guaranteed to be recovered in future sale proceeds.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option C is correct because, with other inputs unchanged, additional holding cash outflows are deducted from the projected proceeds, reducing the present residual available for land. A buyer can therefore pay less for the land today.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: It is added to the land value as an improvement
Option A says the outflows are added to land value as an improvement. Holding costs such as taxes and insurance are expenses, not improvements, and they reduce rather than increase the residual.
Option B: It is ignored, as it is a matter for the owner
Option B says the outflows are ignored as a matter for the owner. A market-oriented development model deducts supported holding costs that a typical buyer would bear.
Option D: It is recovered fully when the land is later sold
Option D says the outflows are recovered fully when the land is later sold. Costs are not guaranteed to be recovered in future sale proceeds; they reduce net proceeds in the model.
Land gets the leftovers
Land is paid last from what remains, so an added cost, with all else unchanged, shrinks its share.
How to use: Use this for any residual model question asking how a change in costs affects land value.
Exam Tip
In residual questions, an increase in any cost or required return lowers the land residual when other inputs are held constant.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Treating holding costs as an addition to land value
- -Counting the same cost both as an expense and in the discount rate
- -Assuming costs will be recovered at sale
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests how costs in a subdivision development or land residual cash-flow model affect land value. Land is the residual after deducting all costs and required profit from expected proceeds, so any added cash outflow lowers the residual.
Background Knowledge
In the subdivision development method, all direct and indirect costs and entrepreneurial incentive are deducted from projected sales of finished lots, and the net proceeds are discounted to present value to indicate raw land value. Each cost should be counted once and modeled consistently with the discount rate. Longer holding periods and higher carrying costs reduce land value.
Real-World Application
A developer's feasibility model for a subdivision shows a longer absorption period, which adds a year of property taxes and insurance. The appraiser's land value under the development method falls accordingly.
More Land/Site Questions
How should an appraiser account for a site's access to public sewer compared with competing sites that require septic systems?
Which fact, if supported by competitive-market evidence, most directly supports a unit-price premium for an otherwise comparable site?
A rectangular site's frontage is doubled while its depth is halved, keeping area constant. What is the likely value effect in a retail district?
A downtown site's zoning height limit is reduced from six stories to three. Buyers in this market had been paying for six-story development potential. What effect on land value is most supportable?
A zoning change increases permitted density from four to eight units per acre. What is the likely effect on site value?
Using the allocation method, market evidence supports a typical land-to-total-property-value ratio of 28% for similar improved properties in the subject’s location. An improved comparable sold for $825,000. What land (site) contribution is indicated by applying that ratio?
An appraiser is valuing a vacant site near a landfill. A similar vacant site that is not affected by the landfill sold for $480,000. Paired land sales indicate that proximity to the landfill lowers site prices by $70,000. No other adjustments apply. What is the indicated value of the subject site?
An appraiser is extracting site value from a $600,000 cash sale. The seller's records show an original construction cost of $250,000 and a depreciated book value of $110,000. The appraiser estimates current replacement cost new at $400,000 and accrued depreciation from all causes at $100,000. What is the indicated site value?
Three parcels assembled under single ownership (standard appraisal guidance assemblage) support separate as-is values of $290,000, $340,000, and $250,000. After assemblage for a higher-utility use, the combined site is valued at $1,050,000. Assemblage costs (demolition, legal, holding, and related) total $55,000. What is the indicated net plottage (plottage increment after assemblage costs)?
A comparable commercial site with 65 front feet sold for a cash-equivalent price of $585,000. Per standard appraisal guidance, sale price per front foot is a vacant-land unit of comparison when frontage is a primary value determinant. The subject site has 72 front feet and is otherwise similar. What indicated land value does the front-foot unit support before other adjustments?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
The subject vacant lot has 80 front feet. Sales of competitive vacant lots indicate a price of $2,500 per front foot. What is the indicated land value?
Next Question
The subject property is a vacant lot on a corridor recently rezoned for fourplexes and actively redeveloping with them. The only improved sale available for extraction is a house on a similar-sized lot in a stable single-unit neighborhood, and it indicates a site value of $140,000. How should the appraiser treat this indication?