EstatePass
sales-comparison-approachmedium

An appraiser uses paired sales to estimate the contributory value of a swimming pool. She identifies three pairs: Pair 1 shows a $14,500 difference; Pair 2, $16,200; Pair 3, $13,800. All pairs control for age, size, condition, location, and sale date (within 5 days). The subject property has a pool. What is the most appropriate way to apply these paired results in the reconciliation?

Correct Answer

B) Average the three amounts ($14,833) and round to the nearest $100 for consistency.

USPAP Standards Rule 1-4(b) requires adjustments to be supported by credible evidence — multiple consistent paired sales strengthen reliability. Averaging credible, well-controlled paired differences is an accepted practice in appraisal practice (as affirmed in the Appraisal Institute's 'The Appraisal of Real Estate', 14th ed., Ch. 13). While rounding is common for reporting clarity, the key principle is using all credible paired evidence collectively. Option A misapplies statistical preference without evidence of outlier status; Option C introduces bias; Option D misuses paired analysis — it supports an adjustment, not a separate valuation approach.

Answer Options
A
Use only the median value ($14,500) because it is resistant to outliers.
B
Average the three amounts ($14,833) and round to the nearest $100 for consistency.
C
Select $16,200 because it is the highest — indicating strongest buyer demand in that submarket.
D
Apply each amount separately in three different approaches and average the final opinions of value.

Why This Is the Correct Answer

USPAP Standards Rule 1-4(b) requires adjustments to be supported by credible evidence — multiple consistent paired sales strengthen reliability. Averaging credible, well-controlled paired differences is an accepted practice in appraisal practice (as affirmed in the Appraisal Institute's 'The Appraisal of Real Estate', 14th ed., Ch. 13). While rounding is common for reporting clarity, the key principle is using all credible paired evidence collectively. Option A misapplies statistical preference without evidence of outlier status; Option C introduces bias; Option D misuses paired analysis — it supports an adjustment, not a separate valuation approach.

Was this explanation helpful?

More sales-comparison-approach Questions

Excess land differs from surplus land in that excess land:

A subject property has a 3-car attached garage. The appraiser locates two valid paired sales: Sale 1 (with 3-car garage) sold for $512,000; Sale 2 (with 2-car garage) sold for $497,600. Both properties are otherwise identical — same age, quality, GLA, lot size, and neighborhood — and sold 5 days apart in a balanced market. The appraiser also confirms via public records and listing photos that no other functional or physical differences exist. What is the indicated contributory value of the *third* garage stall?

The most appropriate unit of comparison is determined by:

An appraiser analyzes three paired sales to isolate the effect of a fireplace. In Pair 1, the property with a fireplace sold for $12,000 more; in Pair 2, $10,500 more; and in Pair 3, $13,500 more. All pairs are highly similar and recent. The appraiser selects $12,000 as the final adjustment. Which principle best supports this selection?

A paired sales analysis yields an adjustment of −$15,000 for a property located on a busy arterial street. Later, the appraiser discovers that all three paired properties with arterial exposure also had 20% smaller lots than their non-arterial counterparts — a difference not initially controlled for. What is the most appropriate action per USPAP?

An appraiser identifies two comparable sales that are identical in all respects except that Sale #1 has a finished basement (1,200 sq ft) and sold for $432,000, while Sale #2 has an unfinished basement of the same size and sold for $408,000. Both sales occurred within three weeks of each other in a stable market. The appraiser intends to apply a per-square-foot adjustment for basement finish to the subject property, which has a 1,000 sq ft finished basement. What is the appropriate paired-sales-derived adjustment amount per square foot for a finished basement?

Three sales support $520,000; the borrower's purchase contract is $505,000. May the appraisal conclude above the contract price?

An appraiser develops a $3,200 adjustment for a fireplace based on a single paired sale. The subject has a fireplace; Comparable A does not. The appraiser applies +$3,200 to Comparable A. Later, the appraiser identifies a second pair showing a $4,600 fireplace contribution. The appraiser replaces the original adjustment with $3,900 — the simple average — and applies it to Comparable A. What is the appropriate USPAP-compliant action regarding the adjustment amount?

A comparable sold for $300,000 with the seller carrying a loan 2 points below market, a benefit worth $8,000. What is its cash-equivalent price?

Three comparables adjust to $412,000 (gross adj. 5%), $405,000 (gross adj. 22%), and $410,000 (gross adj. 8%). What is the best-supported value conclusion?

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing