A condition adjustment is supported by contractor bids to cure deferred maintenance. What caveat applies?
Correct Answer
C) Cost to cure works only when the market would respond dollar-for-dollar
Why this is correct: While contractor bids provide the cost to cure deferred maintenance, this cost directly supports a condition adjustment only if the market would pay dollar-for-dollar for the repair. Often, market reaction differs due to factors like hassle or risk. Why the other choices are wrong: Bids are not routinely halved by rule. Licensed general contractors are not exclusively required. Cost and value are not always equal; market reaction determines the adjustment. Exam tip: Use cost to cure as a starting point, but adjust based on likely market response.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
The caveat is exactly that cost to cure supports a condition adjustment only to the extent the market responds dollar for dollar, and markets frequently do not. That is why the same principle underlies the curable versus incurable test, where an item is curable only if the value added at least equals the cost to cure. Framing cost as a starting point keeps the adjustment anchored to market behavior rather than to a contractor's estimate. Where paired sales show the market discounts more than cost, the larger figure governs.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Bids overstate everything and are halved by rule
Halving bids by rule is a rule of thumb with no market derivation, and it would be as wrong in a market that discounts more than cost as in one that pays full cost. Bids can be high, low, or accurate depending on the contractor, the scope, and the local labor market. Substituting an arbitrary haircut for market analysis replaces one unsupported number with another.
Option B: Repair bids are usable only when obtained from licensed general contractors
A licensed general contractor's bid is often the most credible source, but it is not the only acceptable one. Specialty trade bids, published cost services, and the appraiser's own supported cost analysis can all provide credible cost data depending on the assignment. The real requirement is that the cost figure be reasonable and supportable, not that it come from a particular license class.
Option D: No caveat — cost and value are the same figure
Cost and value coincide only under specific conditions, essentially when improvements represent the highest and best use and there is no depreciation or market imbalance. Treating them as identical erases the concept of depreciation and the entire curable versus incurable analysis. This is the option the whole question exists to refute.
Cost Is Not Value
Cost is what the work takes. Price is what someone paid. Value is what the market would pay. Three different words for three different things, and an adjustment must always land on the third.
How to use: When a question offers a cost figure as support for an adjustment, look for the answer that conditions it on market reaction. Reject options that apply a fixed haircut, restrict the source of the estimate, or equate cost with value.
Exam Tip
The same principle drives the curable test: an item is curable only when the value added equals or exceeds the cost to cure. If a question gives you both numbers, compare them before classifying.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Adopting a contractor bid as the adjustment without testing market reaction
- -Assuming the market always discounts more than cost, or always exactly cost
- -Skipping the value-added versus cost-to-cure comparison when classifying an item as curable
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
Cost and value are different quantities, and the gap between them is one of the oldest lessons in appraisal. A contractor bid tells you what it will cost to cure deferred maintenance; it does not tell you what the market will pay for the cured condition. Sometimes the market pays more than cost, as with a repair that unlocks financing eligibility or removes a stigma. Often it pays less, because buyers discount for the inconvenience of managing the work, the risk that the bid understates the job, the carrying cost during repairs, and the general reluctance to buy a project. The appraiser's condition adjustment must reflect market reaction, which is measured through paired sales of repaired and unrepaired properties or through analysis of how the market has priced similar defects. Cost to cure is a legitimate and useful starting point, and it is often the best available proxy, but it needs to be tested rather than adopted.
Background Knowledge
You need the distinction between cost, price, and value, the definition of deferred maintenance, and the curable versus incurable test measured as value added against cost to cure. You should also know paired sales analysis as the standard way to measure a market's reaction to a condition difference.
Real-World Application
An appraiser holds a $22,000 bid to replace a failing roof and finds paired sales showing homes with failed roofs sold about $30,000 below comparable homes with sound roofs. She adjusts by the market-derived $30,000 rather than the bid, explaining that buyers discounted beyond cost for risk and inconvenience.
More Sales Comparison Questions
Excess land differs from surplus land in that excess land:
A paired sales analysis reveals that homes with stainless-steel appliances sell for $2,100 more than identical homes with standard appliances — but only when the homes are priced below $350,000. In the subject’s neighborhood, median sale price is $410,000. What is the appraiser’s obligation regarding the $2,100 appliance adjustment?
GLA differs by 210 sq ft between subject and comparable. Paired sales support $65 per sq ft of living area. The line adjustment is:
Paired sales are drawn from transactions six months apart in a stable market. The time adjustment needed is:
The most appropriate unit of comparison is determined by:
A comparable superior to the subject in every adjusted category should produce an indication that is:
Three sales support $520,000; the borrower's purchase contract is $505,000. May the appraisal conclude above the contract price?
A comparable sold for $300,000 with the seller carrying a loan 2 points below market, a benefit worth $8,000. What is its cash-equivalent price?
Why is a foreclosure sale generally a poor comparable in a stable market?
A comparable sold 8 months ago for $250,000 in a market appreciating 6% per year. What is the time-adjusted price?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
A comparable's buyer assumed a below-market loan, worth a $12,000 premium folded into its $310,000 price. Cash-equivalent price:
Next Question
An appraiser uses paired sales to estimate the contributory value of a swimming pool. She identifies three pairs: Pair 1 shows a $14,500 difference; Pair 2, $16,200; Pair 3, $13,800. All pairs control for age, size, condition, location, and sale date (within 5 days). The subject property has a pool. What is the most appropriate way to apply these paired results in the reconciliation?