For a vacant site, three reasonably probable uses are legally permissible, physically possible and financially feasible. After accounting for their relevant costs, timing and risk, what distinguishes the highest and best use?
Correct Answer
D) The use producing the greatest land value
Among uses passing the other tests, the maximally productive use supports the highest present land value. Compare supported residuals consistently after relevant costs and entrepreneurial return, timing and risk. The owner’s preference, the smallest capital outlay or the most common surrounding use does not automatically identify that result.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option D is correct because, among the financially feasible uses, the one that produces the highest land value on a risk-adjusted basis is the highest and best use of the land as though vacant. This is the maximally productive test. The comparison is made after accounting for each use's costs, entrepreneurial return, timing and risk.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: The use the current owner intends to pursue
Option A, the use the current owner intends to pursue, is wrong because highest and best use is a market-based conclusion, not the owner's personal plan. An owner may intend a use that produces less land value than another feasible use.
Option B: The use requiring the smallest capital outlay
Option B, the use requiring the smallest capital outlay, is wrong because a low-cost use can produce a lower residual land value. The test compares the land value each use supports, not which one is cheapest to build.
Option C: The use most common in the surrounding area
Option C, the use most common in the surrounding area, is wrong because a prevalent neighborhood use is not necessarily the one producing the greatest land value for this site. Surrounding uses are evidence to consider but do not decide maximal productivity.
Four filters, then pick the top
Legal, physical and financial tests are filters; maximal productivity is the ranking step that picks the use with the highest land value.
How to use: Use this when a question says several uses already pass the first three tests and asks what decides the winner.
Exam Tip
If the stem says the uses already pass the legal, physical and feasibility tests, the answer will relate to the highest land value, not to preference, cost or popularity.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Adopting the owner's planned use as highest and best use
- -Choosing the cheapest use to develop
- -Assuming the most common neighborhood use must be the most productive
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the fourth highest-and-best-use test, maximal productivity. When several uses are already legally permissible, physically possible and financially feasible, the highest and best use is the one producing the highest land value on a risk-adjusted basis. Owner preferences, capital outlay and neighborhood popularity are not the deciding test.
Background Knowledge
Highest and best use is the reasonably probable use that is legally permissible, physically possible, financially feasible and maximally productive. The first three tests narrow the candidate uses, and the last test selects the use that produces the highest residual land value.
Real-World Application
An appraiser analyzing a vacant corner lot finds that a single-family home, a duplex and a row of townhouses are all permitted and feasible. After estimating each use's residual land value with consistent costs, returns and risk, the appraiser concludes the use with the highest residual is the highest and best use.
More Land/Site Questions
How should an appraiser account for a site's access to public sewer compared with competing sites that require septic systems?
Which fact, if supported by competitive-market evidence, most directly supports a unit-price premium for an otherwise comparable site?
A rectangular site's frontage is doubled while its depth is halved, keeping area constant. What is the likely value effect in a retail district?
A downtown site's zoning height limit is reduced from six stories to three. Buyers in this market had been paying for six-story development potential. What effect on land value is most supportable?
A zoning change increases permitted density from four to eight units per acre. What is the likely effect on site value?
Using the allocation method, market evidence supports a typical land-to-total-property-value ratio of 28% for similar improved properties in the subject’s location. An improved comparable sold for $825,000. What land (site) contribution is indicated by applying that ratio?
An appraiser is valuing a vacant site near a landfill. A similar vacant site that is not affected by the landfill sold for $480,000. Paired land sales indicate that proximity to the landfill lowers site prices by $70,000. No other adjustments apply. What is the indicated value of the subject site?
An appraiser is extracting site value from a $600,000 cash sale. The seller's records show an original construction cost of $250,000 and a depreciated book value of $110,000. The appraiser estimates current replacement cost new at $400,000 and accrued depreciation from all causes at $100,000. What is the indicated site value?
Three parcels assembled under single ownership (standard appraisal guidance assemblage) support separate as-is values of $290,000, $340,000, and $250,000. After assemblage for a higher-utility use, the combined site is valued at $1,050,000. Assemblage costs (demolition, legal, holding, and related) total $55,000. What is the indicated net plottage (plottage increment after assemblage costs)?
A comparable commercial site with 65 front feet sold for a cash-equivalent price of $585,000. Per standard appraisal guidance, sale price per front foot is a vacant-land unit of comparison when frontage is a primary value determinant. The subject site has 72 front feet and is otherwise similar. What indicated land value does the front-foot unit support before other adjustments?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
An appraiser estimates that 40 finished lots in a subdivision will sell for $85,000 each. All non-land development, selling and holding costs plus entrepreneurial incentive total $2,100,000. Ignoring the timing of all receipts and payments, what residual remains for the land?
Next Question
In applying the cost approach to an improved property, why is the land component estimated separately under an as-vacant highest-and-best-use premise?