Additional land is not needed to support the existing improvements and cannot support an independent use or separate sale under the applicable constraints. How is it generally classified?
Correct Answer
B) Surplus land, with its contributory value evaluated in the whole property.
Surplus land is additional land that cannot support an independent use or sale separate from the improved parcel under the stated conditions. It may contribute amenity or other value to the whole property, but the amount is a market question. It is not automatically valued at the same unit rate as independently buildable land, deducted as worthless or assigned a universal declining rate.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option B is correct because surplus land is additional land that cannot be used or sold separately from the improved parcel. It may add some value to the whole property, and that contribution is measured from market evidence.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Excess land requiring a separate valuation
Option A, excess land requiring a separate valuation, does not fit these facts. Excess land can support an independent use or separate sale, but this land cannot.
Option C: Valued at the same per-foot rate as the buildable area of the main site
Option C, valuing it at the same per-foot rate as the main site's buildable area, ignores its limited utility. Surplus land cannot be developed independently, so the market may not pay the same unit rate for it.
Option D: Deducted from the site area before valuation
Option D, deducting it from the site area before valuation, treats it as worthless. Surplus land may still contribute value to the whole property, which must be evaluated.
Excess exits, surplus stays
Excess land can exit through separate sale or use. Surplus land stays with the property and adds only what the market says it contributes.
How to use: Use this phrase to classify extra land after checking whether it can be separated.
Exam Tip
If the facts say the land cannot support an independent use or sale, think surplus. If it can, think excess.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Calling non-separable land excess land
- -Valuing surplus land at the full buildable-lot rate
- -Ignoring surplus land's contribution to value
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the difference between excess land and surplus land. Land that is not needed for the existing improvements but cannot support an independent use or separate sale is surplus land. Its contribution is evaluated as part of the whole property.
Background Knowledge
A parcel may have more land than its existing improvement or highest and best use requires. If the extra land is separately marketable or can support an independent use, it is excess land; if it cannot stand alone, it is surplus land, which may still contribute some value to the property as a whole. The distinction affects whether the land is valued separately or as a contribution to the whole.
Real-World Application
An appraiser values a house on an oversized lot where the extra area is too narrow and lacks access for a separate building site. She treats it as surplus land and measures its contribution using sales of similar oversized lots.
More Land/Site Questions
How should an appraiser account for a site's access to public sewer compared with competing sites that require septic systems?
Which fact, if supported by competitive-market evidence, most directly supports a unit-price premium for an otherwise comparable site?
A rectangular site's frontage is doubled while its depth is halved, keeping area constant. What is the likely value effect in a retail district?
A downtown site's zoning height limit is reduced from six stories to three. Buyers in this market had been paying for six-story development potential. What effect on land value is most supportable?
A zoning change increases permitted density from four to eight units per acre. What is the likely effect on site value?
Using the allocation method, market evidence supports a typical land-to-total-property-value ratio of 28% for similar improved properties in the subject’s location. An improved comparable sold for $825,000. What land (site) contribution is indicated by applying that ratio?
An appraiser is valuing a vacant site near a landfill. A similar vacant site that is not affected by the landfill sold for $480,000. Paired land sales indicate that proximity to the landfill lowers site prices by $70,000. No other adjustments apply. What is the indicated value of the subject site?
An appraiser is extracting site value from a $600,000 cash sale. The seller's records show an original construction cost of $250,000 and a depreciated book value of $110,000. The appraiser estimates current replacement cost new at $400,000 and accrued depreciation from all causes at $100,000. What is the indicated site value?
Three parcels assembled under single ownership (standard appraisal guidance assemblage) support separate as-is values of $290,000, $340,000, and $250,000. After assemblage for a higher-utility use, the combined site is valued at $1,050,000. Assemblage costs (demolition, legal, holding, and related) total $55,000. What is the indicated net plottage (plottage increment after assemblage costs)?
A comparable commercial site with 65 front feet sold for a cash-equivalent price of $585,000. Per standard appraisal guidance, sale price per front foot is a vacant-land unit of comparison when frontage is a primary value determinant. The subject site has 72 front feet and is otherwise similar. What indicated land value does the front-foot unit support before other adjustments?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
The subject is a vacant site inside a mapped flood zone. A comparable vacant site outside the flood zone sold for $360,000. Paired land sales indicate a flood-zone discount of $42,000, which makes the subject inferior to the comparable. No other adjustments apply. What is the indicated land value of the subject?
Next Question
An appraiser estimates that 40 finished lots in a subdivision will sell for $85,000 each. All non-land development, selling and holding costs plus entrepreneurial incentive total $2,100,000. Ignoring the timing of all receipts and payments, what residual remains for the land?