EstatePass
Sales ComparisonEASY16.4% of exam

A parent corporation transfers a property to its subsidiary at accounting book value, without independent market-price negotiation. What best characterizes its appraisal evidence?

Correct Answer

D) It is a related accounting transfer requiring market-evidence scrutiny

This is a related-party accounting transfer. Verify whether its price and circumstances provide relevant evidence for the defined market-value problem; book value alone does not establish market value. Confirmation proves neither independent bargaining nor a market adjustment amount. No universal corporate-transfer discount or automatic reliability ranking follows.

Answer Options
A
The book amount is market value whenever the parent confirms it
B
It is the most reliable competitive comparable in the data set
C
It becomes market evidence after a fixed corporate-transfer discount
D
It is a related accounting transfer requiring market-evidence scrutiny

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Option D is correct because this is a related-party accounting transfer, and market value is unlikely to equal book value from accounting records. The appraiser must verify whether the price and circumstances offer any relevant market evidence before relying on it.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: The book amount is market value whenever the parent confirms it

Option A says the book amount is market value whenever the parent confirms it. Confirmation of an accounting figure does not show independent bargaining, and book value is not the same as market value.

Option B: It is the most reliable competitive comparable in the data set

Option B calls it the most reliable competitive comparable in the data set. A related-party transfer at book value without market negotiation is among the least reliable indicators, not the most reliable.

Option C: It becomes market evidence after a fixed corporate-transfer discount

Option C says it becomes market evidence after a fixed corporate-transfer discount. No standard fixed discount converts such a transfer into a market sale; any adjustment would need market support.

Book value isn't market value

Accounting books record history, while market value reflects what a typical buyer would pay today.

How to use: Use this whenever a stem mentions book value or an intercompany transfer.

Exam Tip

Related-party and non-negotiated transfers call for scrutiny; be wary of answers that treat them as reliable or fix them with a set percentage.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • -Treating recorded book value as market value
  • -Applying an arbitrary discount to a related-party transfer
  • -Using intercompany transfers without verifying their circumstances

Concept Deep Dive

Analysis

This question tests how to treat an intercompany transfer at book value. A transfer between related corporations without market negotiation is not reliable market evidence on its face, so it must be scrutinized rather than accepted or adjusted by formula.

Background Knowledge

Book value reflects accounting entries such as historical cost less depreciation, not what buyers and sellers would pay. Transfers between related entities may not involve market exposure or independent negotiation, so they require careful verification before being used as comparables.

Real-World Application

While researching industrial sales, an appraiser finds a deed transferring a warehouse from a corporation to its subsidiary. Learning it was recorded at book value with no marketing, the appraiser excludes it from the comparables after documenting why it is not market evidence.

related-party transferbook valuemarket valueverificationconditions of sale
Was this explanation helpful?

More Sales Comparison Questions

Supported adjustments are: non-market financing $10,000, GLA $36/sf, garage $3,500 per car, pool/spa $12,500. A comparable identical to the 2,800 sf subject sold for $267,000 with non-market financing. What is its adjusted price?

Using GLA $36/sf and non-market financing $10,000: a 3,100 sf comparable sold for $277,000 with non-market financing; the subject has 2,800 sf. Bath count differences are not adjusted. What is the adjusted price?

Using garage $3,500 per car and pool/spa $12,500: a comparable with a 2-car garage and a pool/spa sold for $268,000. The subject has a 3-car garage and no pool. What is the adjusted price?

Using GLA $36/sf, garage $3,500 per car and pool/spa $12,500: a 2,600 sf comparable with a 2-car garage and a pool/spa sold for $264,000. The subject is 2,800 sf with a 3-car garage and no pool. What is the adjusted price?

In a neighborhood with declining values and marketing times over six months, what must Fannie Mae lenders confirm about the sales comparison analysis?

A house is a 4,000 square foot home in an area of 2,000 square foot homes. How must the appraiser treat this over-improvement in the sales comparison grid?

According to the Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines, which items should an appraisal’s market conditions discussion include?

A comparable listed at $420,000 and sold for $399,000. What sale-to-list price ratio (sale price ÷ list price) does this indicate?

An appraiser wants to describe the neighborhood boundaries in a Fannie Mae report. Which approach is acceptable?

Which of these is listed by Fannie Mae as a sales or financing concession?

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing