A comparable sold for all cash in a market where financed sales dominate. The appraiser should:
Correct Answer
D) Test whether the cash terms affected price, and adjust if shown
Why this is correct: Cash terms may affect price, but not always. The appraiser must test empirically whether a discount occurred in this market for this sale and adjust only if shown. Why the other choices are wrong: Deduct a standard ten percent from every all-cash transaction is a blanket rule, not supported by market evidence. Reject the sale, since cash buyers behave unpredictably always is incorrect; cash sales are valid if analyzed. Add the typical loan costs to the recorded price for parity is wrong; cash equivalency adjusts down, not up. Exam tip: Cash equivalency adjustments require market evidence, not assumptions.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Testing whether the cash terms actually affected price, then adjusting only if the evidence shows an effect, is the method USPAP's development requirements support: the appraiser verifies the terms and conditions of each sale and adjusts where market evidence justifies it. It keeps the burden of proof where it belongs, on demonstrated market reaction rather than on assumption. It also preserves a usable comparable in the common case where cash made no difference. The answer is deliberately conditional because the correct professional response is an investigation, not a reflex.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Deduct a standard ten percent from every all-cash transaction
A standard ten percent deduction applied to every cash sale is a rule of thumb with no market derivation behind it, and rules of thumb cannot support an adjustment. The size of any cash discount varies by property type, market liquidity, and seller circumstances, and in many markets it is zero. Applying a fixed percentage would inject a systematic bias into every grid the appraiser builds.
Option B: Reject the sale, since cash buyers behave unpredictably always
Rejecting cash sales outright would discard some of the cleanest data available, since a cash transaction carries no financing concessions to unwind at all. In many commercial and land markets cash sales are the norm rather than the anomaly. The word always is the flag, and the reasoning behind it, that cash buyers are unpredictable, is asserted rather than demonstrated.
Option C: Add the typical loan costs to the recorded price for parity
Adding typical loan costs to the recorded price moves the adjustment in the wrong direction and misunderstands what cash equivalency measures. The technique restates a price to what it would have been under typical financing; it does not gross a price up by the transaction costs a financed buyer would have incurred. Loan origination costs are a buyer expense, not a component of the price paid for the real estate.
Prove It, Then Adjust It
No adjustment without evidence. Every line in the grid should trace back to something observable in the market, whether a matched pair, a survey, a cost figure, or an income differential. An adjustment you cannot source is a guess wearing a dollar sign.
How to use: When answer choices offer a fixed percentage, an automatic rejection, or a conditional test, choose the conditional test. Exams reward the answer that investigates before it adjusts.
Exam Tip
Remember that a conventionally financed sale is normally already cash equivalent, because the seller receives full cash at closing. Only concessionary terms such as seller carrybacks, buydowns, or paid closing costs require the adjustment.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Applying a rule-of-thumb percentage instead of a market-derived adjustment
- -Assuming any unusual transaction characteristic must produce a price effect
- -Confusing a buyer's loan costs with the price paid for the real estate
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
Cash equivalency exists to restate a sale price as though it had been made on the financing terms typical for the market. That framing cuts both ways. In a market where nearly all buyers finance, an all-cash purchase is atypical, and in some markets cash buyers extract a discount for speed and certainty while in others they pay the same as anyone else because the seller nets the same amount either way. Which of those is true is a question about this market and this transaction, answerable only by verification and by looking for evidence such as paired sales of cash and financed transactions or interviews with the parties. Note also that most conventional financed sales are already cash equivalent to the seller, since the lender funds the purchase at closing, so the mere presence of a loan does not itself distort price. The distortion arises from concessionary terms, not from the existence of a mortgage.
Background Knowledge
You need the market value definition's assumption of financing terms typical for the area, the concept and mechanics of cash equivalency, and the requirement to verify the terms and conditions of every comparable sale. You should also know that paired sales analysis is the usual way to test whether a market actually reacts to a given transaction characteristic.
Real-World Application
An appraiser in a land market where roughly half of sales are cash tests for a discount by pairing cash and financed sales of similar parcels in the same quarter. Finding no measurable difference, she uses the cash sale unadjusted and documents the test so a reviewer can see why no adjustment was made.
More Sales Comparison Questions
Excess land differs from surplus land in that excess land:
A paired sales analysis reveals that homes with stainless-steel appliances sell for $2,100 more than identical homes with standard appliances — but only when the homes are priced below $350,000. In the subject’s neighborhood, median sale price is $410,000. What is the appraiser’s obligation regarding the $2,100 appliance adjustment?
GLA differs by 210 sq ft between subject and comparable. Paired sales support $65 per sq ft of living area. The line adjustment is:
Paired sales are drawn from transactions six months apart in a stable market. The time adjustment needed is:
The most appropriate unit of comparison is determined by:
A comparable superior to the subject in every adjusted category should produce an indication that is:
Three sales support $520,000; the borrower's purchase contract is $505,000. May the appraisal conclude above the contract price?
A comparable sold for $300,000 with the seller carrying a loan 2 points below market, a benefit worth $8,000. What is its cash-equivalent price?
Why is a foreclosure sale generally a poor comparable in a stable market?
A comparable sold 8 months ago for $250,000 in a market appreciating 6% per year. What is the time-adjusted price?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam