EstatePass
Fair Housing Ada EthicsFederal_and_fl_fair_housingHARD

A Florida property manager receives rental applications from two equally qualified candidates: one is a single mother with three children, the other is a married couple without children. The manager selects the couple, stating that families with children cause more wear and tear. This decision is:

Correct Answer

C) Illegal familial status discrimination regardless of the stated business reasoning

Correct: This constitutes illegal familial status discrimination; business reasoning doesn't justify discrimination against protected classes. Why not A: Maintenance concerns don't override fair housing protections. Why not B: Documentation of costs doesn't justify discriminating against families. Why not D: Higher deposits for families would also constitute illegal discrimination.

Answer Options
A
Legal based on legitimate business considerations about property maintenance
B
Legal if the manager can document higher maintenance costs from families with children
C
Illegal familial status discrimination regardless of the stated business reasoning
D
Legal if the property lease includes higher security deposits for families

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Deep Analysis of This Fair Housing Ada Ethics Question

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Background Knowledge for Fair Housing Ada Ethics

Sign up free to unlock full analysis
Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Real World Application in Fair Housing Ada Ethics

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Common Mistakes to Avoid on Fair Housing Ada Ethics Questions

Sign up free to unlock full analysis

Related Topics & Key Terms

Key Terms:

familial_statusrental_decisionsbusiness_justificationdiscrimination

Related Concepts

Antitrust violations in real estate occur when competing brokerages or agents engage in practices that restrain trade, reduce competition, or harm consumers through collusion. These violations are governed by the Sherman Antitrust Act and can result in severe penalties.

Broker supervision is the legal obligation of a designated or managing broker to oversee and be accountable for the real estate activities of all salespersons and associate brokers operating under their license.

Commingling is the illegal act of mixing client funds with a broker's personal or business operating funds, while conversion is the unauthorized use of client funds for the broker's own benefit. Both are serious violations that can result in license revocation.

Was this explanation helpful?

More Fair Housing Ada Ethics Questions

People Also Study

Related Articles

Practice More Questions

Access 2,000+ practice questions and pass your real estate exam.

Start Practicing