Which listed item describes an economic change rather than an incident of real-property ownership?
Correct Answer
A) A decline in value from wear or obsolescence
A decline in value from wear or obsolescence describes economic depreciation. Possession, lawful control and exclusion are ownership incidents subject to legal limits. This distinction does not deny that tax law may permit depreciation deductions for eligible property; that is a separate legal and accounting question.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option A is correct because a decline in value from wear or obsolescence describes depreciation, an economic change in value. It is not a right held by an owner. The other choices are incidents of ownership subject to legal limits.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B: The right to exclude subject to applicable law
Option B, the right to exclude subject to applicable law, is a classic incident of real property ownership. It is part of the bundle of rights, not an economic change.
Option C: The right to control lawful use
Option C, the right to control lawful use, is an incident of ownership. Owners may decide how the property is used within legal limits.
Option D: The right to possess the property
Option D, the right to possess the property, is a core incident of ownership. Possession is one of the rights in the bundle, not a change in value.
Rights versus value changes
Ownership incidents are things an owner can do, such as possess, control or exclude. Depreciation is something that happens to value.
How to use: Use this to spot the one option that is an economic event rather than a right.
Exam Tip
When three choices start with the right to, check whether the odd one out is an economic concept. Here it describes a loss in value.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Treating depreciation as one of the ownership rights
- -Confusing appraisal depreciation with tax depreciation
- -Forgetting that ownership rights are subject to legal limits
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the difference between ownership rights and economic concepts. Possession, control of lawful use and the right to exclude are incidents of ownership in the bundle of rights. A decline in value from wear or obsolescence is economic depreciation, not an ownership right.
Background Knowledge
The bundle of rights theory describes ownership as a set of rights, including possession, control, enjoyment, exclusion and disposition. Depreciation is a loss in value from physical deterioration, functional obsolescence or external obsolescence. Tax depreciation for eligible property is a separate legal and accounting matter.
Real-World Application
An appraiser explains to a homeowner that owning the home includes the rights to live there, decide its lawful use and keep others out. Separately, the appraiser notes that an outdated kitchen and worn roof reduce value through depreciation. The two ideas are reported in different parts of the analysis.
More Property Description Questions
Which stated cause of supported value loss is external?
Improvement cost new is $450,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $45,000, $25,000, $15,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. Add supported site value of $125,000, already reflecting any site losses. What total indicated value results?
Which two depreciation categories may each be classified as curable or incurable by comparing the cost to remedy a deficiency with the value gained?
Improvement cost new is $800,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $120,000, $80,000, $40,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. No site is included. What depreciated improvement amount results?
The principle of anticipation in real estate valuation states that:
Which highest-and-best-use criterion addresses whether a proposed use is allowed by zoning and applicable legal restrictions?
Three comparables produce adjusted indications of $312,000, $309,000 and $315,000, requiring gross adjustments of 9%, 14% and 22% respectively. Verification also establishes that the first sale is the closest competitive substitute and its adjustments are better supported than the other two. Which indication deserves the most weight on those facts?
When reconciling value indications from the three approaches to value, an appraiser should:
A property sold at a cash-equivalent price of $1,062,500. Its stabilized annual NOI is $85,000. What is the indicated overall rate?
In reconciliation, an appraiser should:
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Related Tools
Previous Question
Two otherwise identical cash-equivalent sales, with all other influences controlled, sold for $365,000 with a fireplace and $350,000 without one. What directions follow from this pair?
Next Question
A property could lawfully and feasibly stay in its current use, with annual net operating income (NOI) of $75,000, or convert to an alternative use with annual NOI of $85,000. The capitalization rate for each use is 8%. Conversion would be immediate at a total cost of $200,000, with no delays or other costs. What is the higher net indicated value of the two uses?