EstatePass
Sales ComparisonMEDIUM16.4% of exam

A comparable’s cash-equivalent price is $425,000. Evidence supports a simple, noncompounded 0.5% upward adjustment per month, based on the original price, for a verified 8-month contract-to-effective-date interval. What adjusted price results?

Correct Answer

A) $442,000

425000 × [1 + (0.005 × 8)] = 442000. The signed change is 17000; compound growth is a different convention.

Answer Options
A
$442,000
B
$442,300
C
$408,000
D
$17,000

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Option A is correct because the simple adjustment is 0.5% × 8 months = 4% of the original price. The adjusted price is $425,000 × (1 + 0.005 × 8) = $425,000 × 1.04 = $442,000. The stem specifies a simple, noncompounded rate on the original price.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option B: $442,300

Option B, $442,300, comes from compounding: $425,000 × (1.005)^8 is about $442,300. The stem specifies a simple rate on the original price, so the correct result is $425,000 × 1.04 = $442,000.

Option C: $408,000

Option C, $408,000, applies the 4% change downward: $425,000 - $17,000. The evidence supports an upward adjustment, giving $425,000 + $17,000 = $442,000.

Option D: $17,000

Option D, $17,000, is only the dollar amount of the adjustment ($425,000 × 0.04), not the adjusted price. The question asks for the adjusted price, $442,000.

Simple means multiply once

For simple growth, multiply the rate by the months, then apply that total once to the original price.

How to use: Use this to separate the simple answer from the slightly higher compound answer.

Exam Tip

When two answers differ by only a few hundred dollars, check whether the stem says simple or compound before choosing.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • -Compounding when the stem specifies a simple rate
  • -Reporting the dollar adjustment instead of the adjusted price
  • -Applying an upward market trend as a downward adjustment

Concept Deep Dive

Analysis

This question tests a simple monthly time adjustment based on the original price. With simple growth, the monthly rate is multiplied by the number of months and applied once to the original price. The distractors reflect compounding, the wrong direction and reporting only the dollar change.

Background Knowledge

With simple growth, the change is earned only on the original amount, so the total change equals the rate times the number of periods. Compound growth applies each period's rate to the already adjusted amount. Fannie Mae requires that time adjustments, or the lack of them, be supported by evidence such as resales of the same property.

Real-World Application

Repeat sales in a neighborhood show prices rising about half a percent per month. A comparable sold 8 months before the effective date for $425,000. Using the supported simple rate, the appraiser adds $17,000 and reports an adjusted price of $442,000.

simple ratetime adjustmentmarket conditionsmonthly rateoriginal price base
Was this explanation helpful?

More Sales Comparison Questions

Which stated cause of supported value loss is external?

Improvement cost new is $450,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $45,000, $25,000, $15,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. Add supported site value of $125,000, already reflecting any site losses. What total indicated value results?

Which two depreciation categories may each be classified as curable or incurable by comparing the cost to remedy a deficiency with the value gained?

Improvement cost new is $800,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $120,000, $80,000, $40,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. No site is included. What depreciated improvement amount results?

The principle of anticipation in real estate valuation states that:

Which highest-and-best-use criterion addresses whether a proposed use is allowed by zoning and applicable legal restrictions?

Three comparables produce adjusted indications of $312,000, $309,000 and $315,000, requiring gross adjustments of 9%, 14% and 22% respectively. Verification also establishes that the first sale is the closest competitive substitute and its adjustments are better supported than the other two. Which indication deserves the most weight on those facts?

When reconciling value indications from the three approaches to value, an appraiser should:

A property sold at a cash-equivalent price of $1,062,500. Its stabilized annual NOI is $85,000. What is the indicated overall rate?

In reconciliation, an appraiser should:

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing