When valuing a site, the appraiser must consider its highest and best use on what basis?
Correct Answer
D) As though vacant and available for development
The land as-though-vacant analysis considers legally permissible, physically possible, financially feasible and maximally productive uses without existing improvements. Separately analyze the actual property as improved and removal/conversion costs; hypothetical vacant value does not automatically equal the existing property’s land contribution.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option D is correct because the site is valued as though vacant and available for development to its highest and best use. This analysis considers legally permissible, physically possible, financially feasible and maximally productive uses without the existing improvements. The property as improved is analyzed separately.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: As currently improved with the existing building
Option A, as currently improved with the existing building, describes the separate analysis of the property as improved. Site value is based on the land as though vacant.
Option B: As the owner intends to use it in the future
Option B, as the owner intends to use it in the future, relies on one owner's plans rather than market-based tests. Highest and best use reflects what the market supports, not personal intentions.
Option C: As restricted by the current owner's financing
Option C, as restricted by the current owner's financing, is wrong because owner financing is a personal arrangement, not a characteristic of the land. It does not define the land's highest and best use.
Clear the site in mind
To value a site, imagine the buildings gone and ask what use the vacant land would best support.
How to use: Use this mental picture whenever a question asks the basis for site value.
Exam Tip
Site value questions point to as though vacant; property-as-improved questions point to the existing improvements.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Valuing the site based on the existing building
- -Using the owner's planned use as highest and best use
- -Treating as-vacant land value as automatically equal to the land's contribution to the improved property
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the basis for site valuation in highest and best use analysis. Even when a property is improved, the site is valued as though vacant and available for development to its highest and best use. Owner intentions, existing buildings and owner financing do not set that basis.
Background Knowledge
Highest and best use is analyzed both as though vacant and as improved. The as-though-vacant analysis supports site valuation, while the as-improved analysis decides whether to keep, modify or remove existing improvements. Hypothetical vacant value does not automatically equal the land's contribution to the existing property.
Real-World Application
An appraiser valuing an older house on a lot rezoned for townhomes estimates site value as if the lot were vacant and available for townhome development. Separately, the appraiser analyzes whether the existing house should be kept as improved.
More Land/Site Questions
How should an appraiser account for a site's access to public sewer compared with competing sites that require septic systems?
Which fact, if supported by competitive-market evidence, most directly supports a unit-price premium for an otherwise comparable site?
A rectangular site's frontage is doubled while its depth is halved, keeping area constant. What is the likely value effect in a retail district?
A downtown site's zoning height limit is reduced from six stories to three. Buyers in this market had been paying for six-story development potential. What effect on land value is most supportable?
A zoning change increases permitted density from four to eight units per acre. What is the likely effect on site value?
Using the allocation method, market evidence supports a typical land-to-total-property-value ratio of 28% for similar improved properties in the subject’s location. An improved comparable sold for $825,000. What land (site) contribution is indicated by applying that ratio?
An appraiser is valuing a vacant site near a landfill. A similar vacant site that is not affected by the landfill sold for $480,000. Paired land sales indicate that proximity to the landfill lowers site prices by $70,000. No other adjustments apply. What is the indicated value of the subject site?
An appraiser is extracting site value from a $600,000 cash sale. The seller's records show an original construction cost of $250,000 and a depreciated book value of $110,000. The appraiser estimates current replacement cost new at $400,000 and accrued depreciation from all causes at $100,000. What is the indicated site value?
Three parcels assembled under single ownership (standard appraisal guidance assemblage) support separate as-is values of $290,000, $340,000, and $250,000. After assemblage for a higher-utility use, the combined site is valued at $1,050,000. Assemblage costs (demolition, legal, holding, and related) total $55,000. What is the indicated net plottage (plottage increment after assemblage costs)?
A comparable commercial site with 65 front feet sold for a cash-equivalent price of $585,000. Per standard appraisal guidance, sale price per front foot is a vacant-land unit of comparison when frontage is a primary value determinant. The subject site has 72 front feet and is otherwise similar. What indicated land value does the front-foot unit support before other adjustments?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
All amounts in a land residual analysis are on one consistent present-value basis. Gross proceeds are $1,500,000; nonland development costs are $650,000; entrepreneurial incentive is $150,000; and all remaining timing and holding deductions are $200,000. These categories do not overlap. What amount remains for land?
Next Question
Sale price per acre is a vacant-land unit of comparison. A comparable vacant tract of 15.0 acres sold for a cash-equivalent $1,800,000 and is otherwise similar to the subject in HBU and market conditions. What indicated site value does that unadjusted per-acre rate support for a subject tract of 11.0 acres?