EstatePass
Sales Comparisonmedium16.4% of exam

Two otherwise identical homes sold three weeks apart: Property X (with a corner lot) sold for $372,000; Property Y (interior lot) sold for $360,000. The appraiser adjusts Property Y upward by $12,000 to reflect the corner lot premium when reconciling to the subject, which also has a corner lot. Which statement best describes the flaw in this reasoning?

Correct Answer

C) The $12,000 difference may reflect time, financing, or negotiation effects — not solely the corner lot — and requires verification that no other differences exist.

Per USPAP Standards Rule 1-4(b), adjustments must be supported by market data and reflect only the influence of the specific characteristic being analyzed. A three-week interval introduces potential time-related value change; without confirming market stability or adjusting for time, the $12,000 differential cannot be conclusively attributed to the corner lot. Option C correctly identifies the need to isolate the feature’s influence — a core requirement of valid paired analysis. Option D is incorrect: USPAP does not prescribe a maximum number of days; it requires the appraiser to consider and address time influence (Standards Rule 1-5).

Answer Options
A
The appraiser should have adjusted Property X downward instead, since it is the one with the premium feature.
B
The adjustment must be applied to the comparable with the differing feature — here, only Property X has the corner lot, so no upward adjustment to Property Y is appropriate.
C
The $12,000 difference may reflect time, financing, or negotiation effects — not solely the corner lot — and requires verification that no other differences exist.
D
USPAP prohibits using sales more than 10 days apart for paired analysis, making both sales invalid for this purpose.

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Per USPAP Standards Rule 1-4(b), adjustments must be supported by market data and reflect only the influence of the specific characteristic being analyzed. A three-week interval introduces potential time-related value change; without confirming market stability or adjusting for time, the $12,000 differential cannot be conclusively attributed to the corner lot. Option C correctly identifies the need to isolate the feature’s influence — a core requirement of valid paired analysis. Option D is incorrect: USPAP does not prescribe a maximum number of days; it requires the appraiser to consider and address time influence (Standards Rule 1-5).

Was this explanation helpful?

More Sales Comparison Questions

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing