Sale A ($302,000) and Sale B ($311,000) are identical except B has a third bathroom and closed six months later in a market rising 4% per year. What does the pair indicate for the bathroom?
Correct Answer
C) $2,960, after removing the time effect
Why this is correct: First, adjust Sale A for market movement. A 4% annual rate equals 2% for six months. $302,000 × 1.02 = $308,040. The price difference after time adjustment is $311,000 - $308,040 = $2,960, which is attributed to the bathroom. Why the other choices are wrong: $9,000 is the raw price difference ignoring time. $15,040 incorrectly adds the time adjustment instead of subtracting it. $4,500 is an arbitrary split with no analytical basis. Exam tip: In paired analysis with a time difference, always time-adjust the older sale to the date of the newer sale first.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Why this is correct: First, adjust Sale A for market movement. A 4% annual rate equals 2% for six months. $302,000 × 1.02 = $308,040. The price difference after time adjustment is $311,000 - $308,040 = $2,960, which is attributed to the bathroom. Why the other choices are wrong: $9,000 is the raw price difference ignoring time. $15,040 incorrectly adds the time adjustment instead of subtracting it. $4,500 is an arbitrary split with no analytical basis. Exam tip: In paired analysis with a time difference, always time-adjust the older sale to the date of the newer sale first.
More sales-comparison-approach Questions
Excess land differs from surplus land in that excess land:
A subject property has a 3-car attached garage. The appraiser locates two valid paired sales: Sale 1 (with 3-car garage) sold for $512,000; Sale 2 (with 2-car garage) sold for $497,600. Both properties are otherwise identical — same age, quality, GLA, lot size, and neighborhood — and sold 5 days apart in a balanced market. The appraiser also confirms via public records and listing photos that no other functional or physical differences exist. What is the indicated contributory value of the *third* garage stall?
The most appropriate unit of comparison is determined by:
An appraiser analyzes three paired sales to isolate the effect of a fireplace. In Pair 1, the property with a fireplace sold for $12,000 more; in Pair 2, $10,500 more; and in Pair 3, $13,500 more. All pairs are highly similar and recent. The appraiser selects $12,000 as the final adjustment. Which principle best supports this selection?
A paired sales analysis yields an adjustment of −$15,000 for a property located on a busy arterial street. Later, the appraiser discovers that all three paired properties with arterial exposure also had 20% smaller lots than their non-arterial counterparts — a difference not initially controlled for. What is the most appropriate action per USPAP?
An appraiser identifies two comparable sales that are identical in all respects except that Sale #1 has a finished basement (1,200 sq ft) and sold for $432,000, while Sale #2 has an unfinished basement of the same size and sold for $408,000. Both sales occurred within three weeks of each other in a stable market. The appraiser intends to apply a per-square-foot adjustment for basement finish to the subject property, which has a 1,000 sq ft finished basement. What is the appropriate paired-sales-derived adjustment amount per square foot for a finished basement?
Three sales support $520,000; the borrower's purchase contract is $505,000. May the appraisal conclude above the contract price?
An appraiser develops a $3,200 adjustment for a fireplace based on a single paired sale. The subject has a fireplace; Comparable A does not. The appraiser applies +$3,200 to Comparable A. Later, the appraiser identifies a second pair showing a $4,600 fireplace contribution. The appraiser replaces the original adjustment with $3,900 — the simple average — and applies it to Comparable A. What is the appropriate USPAP-compliant action regarding the adjustment amount?
A comparable sold for $300,000 with the seller carrying a loan 2 points below market, a benefit worth $8,000. What is its cash-equivalent price?
Three comparables adjust to $412,000 (gross adj. 5%), $405,000 (gross adj. 22%), and $410,000 (gross adj. 8%). What is the best-supported value conclusion?
People Also Study
Valuation Principles & Procedures
25% of exam
Property Description & Analysis
20% of exam
Market Analysis & Highest/Best Use
15% of exam
Appraisal Math & Statistics
15% of exam
USPAP (Ethics & Standards)
15% of exam
Previous Question
An appraiser develops a $36,000 net adjustment for superior site topography in a residential subdivision. Later, the appraiser discovers that two of the three supporting paired sales involved properties with both superior topography *and* upgraded exterior finishes — features not present in the subject or remaining comparable. What is the most appropriate action per USPAP and SR 1-4?
Next Question
A certified residential appraiser applies a 6.5% upward adjustment to a comparable’s sale price for superior view. The subject’s sale price is $320,000. The comparable sold for $300,000 and has the superior view. What is the resulting adjusted sale price of the comparable, and what USPAP principle governs whether percentage or dollar form is permissible for this adjustment?
