EstatePass
Sales ComparisonMEDIUM16.4% of exam

Adjustment estimates are too uncertain to support exact-dollar market precision. What is the reporting concern with presenting a dollar-exact indication as exact market knowledge?

Correct Answer

B) It can imply accuracy the evidence does not support.

Reporting precision should fit the evidence and applicable requirements. A nearest-dollar computed subtotal is not inherently misleading, but presenting it as exact market knowledge when the adjustments cannot support that precision can imply accuracy the evidence does not have. It does not prove the data were verified, satisfy every reporting requirement, or show that the market trades at computed figures.

Answer Options
A
It proves that all of the input data were verified.
B
It can imply accuracy the evidence does not support.
C
It satisfies the reporting requirements for precision.
D
It shows the market trades at exact computed figures.

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Option B is correct because, without adequate market data, the apparent precision of quantitative adjustments can convey a false sense of accuracy. A computed figure to the dollar is not misleading in itself, but presenting it as exact market knowledge implies accuracy the evidence cannot support. Rounding and explanation help the reader understand the real level of certainty.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: It proves that all of the input data were verified.

Option A says a dollar-exact figure proves all input data were verified. Precision in arithmetic says nothing about whether the inputs were verified.

Option C: It satisfies the reporting requirements for precision.

Option C says a dollar-exact figure satisfies the reporting requirements for precision. Reporting precision should fit the evidence and applicable requirements, so exact digits alone do not satisfy them.

Option D: It shows the market trades at exact computed figures.

Option D says a dollar-exact figure shows the market trades at exact computed figures. Market prices result from negotiation, and a computed indication does not show that the market transacts at that exact figure.

Digits are not data

Extra digits in a result do not add accuracy; precision must come from the evidence.

How to use: Use this when judging how precisely to report a value indication.

Exam Tip

Choose the answer that ties reported precision to the quality of the supporting evidence.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • -Treating a precise computed figure as proof of accuracy
  • -Assuming exact digits satisfy reporting requirements

Concept Deep Dive

Analysis

This question tests the concept of false precision in reporting. When adjustments are too uncertain to support exact-dollar accuracy, presenting a computed dollar-exact figure as exact market knowledge can mislead. Reporting precision should match the strength of the evidence.

Background Knowledge

Adjustments are estimates derived from market evidence, and their reliability depends on the quantity and quality of that evidence. When support is limited, quantitative adjustments can look more precise than they are. Appraisers commonly round final indications to reflect the realistic level of accuracy.

Real-World Application

An appraiser's grid produces an indicated value of $412,837 using several adjustments with limited market support. The appraiser reports a rounded opinion and explains the limits of the adjustment data instead of presenting the exact figure as market fact.

false precisionroundingreportingadjustment supportreconciliation
Was this explanation helpful?

More Sales Comparison Questions

Supported adjustments are: non-market financing $10,000, GLA $36/sf, garage $3,500 per car, pool/spa $12,500. A comparable identical to the 2,800 sf subject sold for $267,000 with non-market financing. What is its adjusted price?

Using GLA $36/sf and non-market financing $10,000: a 3,100 sf comparable sold for $277,000 with non-market financing; the subject has 2,800 sf. Bath count differences are not adjusted. What is the adjusted price?

Using garage $3,500 per car and pool/spa $12,500: a comparable with a 2-car garage and a pool/spa sold for $268,000. The subject has a 3-car garage and no pool. What is the adjusted price?

Using GLA $36/sf, garage $3,500 per car and pool/spa $12,500: a 2,600 sf comparable with a 2-car garage and a pool/spa sold for $264,000. The subject is 2,800 sf with a 3-car garage and no pool. What is the adjusted price?

In a neighborhood with declining values and marketing times over six months, what must Fannie Mae lenders confirm about the sales comparison analysis?

A house is a 4,000 square foot home in an area of 2,000 square foot homes. How must the appraiser treat this over-improvement in the sales comparison grid?

According to the Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines, which items should an appraisal’s market conditions discussion include?

A comparable listed at $420,000 and sold for $399,000. What sale-to-list price ratio (sale price ÷ list price) does this indicate?

An appraiser wants to describe the neighborhood boundaries in a Fannie Mae report. Which approach is acceptable?

Which of these is listed by Fannie Mae as a sales or financing concession?

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing