Which distinguishes off-site from on-site improvements by location?
Correct Answer
A) Off-site works lie outside the subject; on-site works lie within it.
For this physical location classification, off-site works lie outside the subject and on-site works within it. Utility connection boundaries and cost inclusions must be verified for the actual assignment.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option A is correct because off-site improvements are located outside the subject property and are often called infrastructure, while on-site improvements include the primary structure and other improvements located on the subject property. The distinction is based on where the improvement physically sits.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B: Both terms refer to parts of the main dwelling, such as its foundation.
Option B is wrong because it says both terms refer to parts of the main dwelling, such as its foundation. Off-site improvements lie outside the subject entirely, so they cannot be parts of the dwelling.
Option C: Municipal works outside are on-site while the subject foundation is off-site.
Option C is wrong because it reverses the labels, calling outside municipal works on-site and the subject foundation off-site. Municipal works outside the property are off-site, and the foundation within the site is on-site.
Option D: The labels establish whether an item is exempt from state property tax.
Option D is wrong because it claims the labels determine whether an item is exempt from state property tax. The terms describe physical location for appraisal purposes, not tax exemption.
Off means outside
Off-site is off the property, out in the street or the utility network. On-site is on the lot, including the house.
How to use: Use this to quickly sort improvements into off-site or on-site by location.
Exam Tip
Look for the answer that uses physical location as the test; options that tie the labels to tax status or reverse them are incorrect.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Reversing the meanings of on-site and off-site
- -Assuming the labels determine property tax treatment
- -Treating off-site improvements as parts of the dwelling
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the location rule for classifying improvements. Off-site improvements are outside the subject property, such as roads and utility systems, while on-site improvements are within it. The labels describe physical location, not tax status or parts of the building.
Background Knowledge
Off-site improvements, often termed infrastructure, include transportation systems, water, sewer and drainage systems, and power and communication facilities located outside the subject. On-site improvements are located on the subject property and include the primary structure. Appraisers should verify where utility connection boundaries fall and what the cost and site estimates include.
Real-World Application
An appraiser valuing a lot in a new subdivision notes that the developer installed streets, curbs and water mains outside the lot, and the buyer built a house and driveway on it. The appraiser treats the streets and mains as off-site improvements and the house and driveway as on-site.
More Cost Approach Questions
Why can equivalent-utility replacement cost be useful for an obsolete improvement?
An appraiser estimates the current replacement cost new of the improvements at $890,000, accrued depreciation from all causes at $170,000, and land value at $325,000. All necessary cost components and depreciation are included in those amounts. What is the indicated property value?
Improvement cost new is $595,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $48,000, $27,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. Add supported site value of $155,000, already reflecting any site losses. What total indicated value results?
What best supports a claimed loss from a bathroom-layout deficiency?
Improvement cost new is $1,850,000. Separately supported improvement depreciation deductions of $310,000, $620,000 are expressly nonoverlapping and not already excluded from cost new. No site is included. What depreciated improvement amount results?
Which scenario most strongly supports giving the cost approach substantial weight?
A cost total $650,000 explicitly includes $40,000 of non-realty FF&E outside the appraised real-property interest. Exclude it. Supported realty-only total depreciation is $55,000. Add site $200,000, with no overlap. What real-property cost indication results?
A 2,200-sf dwelling costs $200 per square foot, and a separate 400-sf garage costs $75 per square foot. These costs are complete and do not overlap. Both have an effective age of 15 years and a total life of 50 years, with straight-line depreciation and no salvage value. No site value or other loss is involved. What is the combined depreciated cost of the dwelling and garage?
A new feature in the improvements has a current cost of $45,000 and a market contribution of $18,000. The entire difference is due to superadequacy, with no physical or external loss and no overlap. What is the loss from the superadequacy?
An external influence causes an annual net income loss of $9,600. The capitalization rate for the loss is 8%, and no other economic factors change. What is the indicated loss in value of the whole property, before allocation between site and improvements?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
Physical paint deterioration costs $4,000 to correct and adds at least $4,000 of value, with no other costs or benefits. What classification fits?
Next Question
Dwelling 2,400 sf costs $128/sf and a separate 480 sf garage $46/sf. No cost item overlaps and land is excluded. What total cost new results?