In reconciling, what does the appropriateness of an approach refer to?
Correct Answer
C) Whether it suits the property and intended use
Appropriateness concerns whether the approach is suitable for the property, market, interest appraised and intended use. A popular approach or recently completed calculation is not necessarily the most applicable one. Its relevance and evidentiary support must be evaluated for this assignment.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option C is correct because appropriateness concerns whether the approach is suitable for the property and the purpose and intended use of the appraisal. Value indicators are reconciled considering the appropriateness of the approach given the purpose of the appraisal. The appraiser must then evaluate the approach's relevance and support for the specific assignment.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Whether the approach is commonly used locally
Option A, whether the approach is commonly used locally, is wrong because local popularity does not establish that an approach suits this particular property or assignment.
Option B: Whether the client has requested that approach
Option B, whether the client has requested that approach, is wrong because a client request does not make an approach suitable for the property. Suitability is determined by the appraiser's analysis.
Option D: Whether the approach was developed most recently
Option D, whether the approach was developed most recently, is wrong because the order in which approaches were completed has no bearing on their suitability.
Appropriate means fits the assignment
An approach is appropriate when it fits the property, the market and the intended use of the appraisal.
How to use: Use this when a question asks what appropriateness of an approach means.
Exam Tip
Look for the answer tying suitability to the property and intended use. Popularity, client requests and timing are distractors.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Equating appropriateness with local popularity
- -Letting the client choose the appropriate approach
- -Confusing appropriateness with data quantity alone
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the meaning of appropriateness as a reconciliation criterion. Appropriateness asks whether an approach suits the property, the market, the interest appraised and the intended use of the appraisal. Popularity, client request or timing of the analysis does not define it.
Background Knowledge
Reconciliation considers the appropriateness of each approach, the accuracy and quantity of its data, and consistency of application. An approach is appropriate when it reflects how the market for that property type and interest typically determines value, given the assignment's intended use.
Real-World Application
For a new custom home in an area with few comparable sales, an appraiser recognizes that the cost approach is especially appropriate because the improvements are new and depreciation is minimal. The appraiser explains this suitability in reconciliation rather than relying on what is commonly used for local homes.
More Reconciliation Questions
In a cost approach for an improved property, an appraiser estimates site value by sales comparison, allocation and extraction, then settles on one site-value figure before final reconciliation. How is this step best described?
An extraordinary assumption was reasonably supported, properly used and disclosed in an appraisal report. Later, the assumed information is found to be false. Which conclusion is best supported?
An otherwise applicable valuation approach cannot be developed reliably from the available data. The remaining scope can produce credible assignment results. What should the appraiser do?
May an appraiser use a hypothetical condition in any assignment?
An appraisal has a current effective date and permits an extraordinary assumption if its requirements are met. Which situation involves uncertain information rather than a fact known to be contrary to reality on that date?
Why must a report identify any real property interest that is being excluded from the value opinion?
Which review best helps explain divergent cost, sales-comparison and income indications?
Two value indications are $340,000 and $392,000. What is the difference as a percentage of the lower indication, rounded to one decimal place?
An unauthorized third party requests a lender-client’s report. No due-process or other permitted disclosure exception applies. How should the appraiser respond?
An appraiser proposes to assume there are no hidden defects. Which fact would characterize that assumption as extraordinary under the USPAP 2024 definition, rather than justify dismissing it as routine boilerplate?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Previous Question
Two approaches to value indicate $545,000 and $525,000, and the appraiser assigns them weights of 60% and 40%, respectively. What is the weighted indication, rounded to the nearest dollar?
Next Question
Which statement is an analytical premise rather than reasoning about reconciling value indications?