Why should the reconciliation address the quantity of evidence as well as its quality?
Correct Answer
D) One excellent sale may still be a single observation
Even an excellent sale remains one observation. Assess whether the quantity and quality of evidence adequately support the conclusion; additional relevant observations may reveal a market pattern. More poor comparables are not automatically better, and no statistical reliability or fixed sale count can be inferred merely from these descriptions.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option D is correct because one excellent sale may still be a single observation, and quantity matters for judging whether evidence adequately supports a conclusion. USPAP directs the appraiser to reconcile the quality and quantity of data available and analyzed. Additional relevant observations can confirm whether the excellent sale reflects a market pattern.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: USPAP requires a count of data points be reported
Option A is wrong because the reason to consider quantity is not a USPAP requirement to report a count of data points. Quantity matters because it affects whether the evidence adequately supports the conclusion.
Option B: Quantity of sales matters more than how comparable each one is
Option B is wrong because quantity of sales does not matter more than how comparable each one is. Many poor comparables are not automatically better than a few good ones; quality and quantity are considered together.
Option C: A single verified sale is stronger than several
Option C is wrong because a single verified sale is not necessarily stronger than several. One observation, however good, cannot show whether it reflects the broader market as well as several relevant sales can.
One swallow, no summer
Like the saying that one swallow does not make a summer, one excellent sale does not by itself prove a market pattern.
How to use: Use this when a question weighs a single strong sale against the need for more evidence.
Exam Tip
Avoid answers that say quantity outranks quality or the reverse. USPAP asks for both to be reconciled.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Believing more comparables are better regardless of quality
- -Relying on one sale without checking whether it reflects the market
- -Thinking USPAP sets a required minimum count of data points
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests why USPAP pairs quantity with quality in reconciliation. Even an excellent sale is still one observation, and a single data point cannot show a market pattern by itself. The correct answer recognizes this limit without claiming that more data is always better.
Background Knowledge
Quality refers to how comparable and well verified the data are; quantity refers to how many relevant observations exist. Both affect how much confidence the conclusion deserves. No fixed sale count can be inferred from general descriptions of evidence.
Real-World Application
An appraiser finds one nearly identical sale next door to the subject. Before relying on it, the appraiser looks for additional sales in the neighborhood to confirm the price level is typical rather than the result of a motivated buyer.
More Reconciliation Questions
In a cost approach for an improved property, an appraiser estimates site value by sales comparison, allocation and extraction, then settles on one site-value figure before final reconciliation. How is this step best described?
An extraordinary assumption was reasonably supported, properly used and disclosed in an appraisal report. Later, the assumed information is found to be false. Which conclusion is best supported?
An otherwise applicable valuation approach cannot be developed reliably from the available data. The remaining scope can produce credible assignment results. What should the appraiser do?
May an appraiser use a hypothetical condition in any assignment?
An appraisal has a current effective date and permits an extraordinary assumption if its requirements are met. Which situation involves uncertain information rather than a fact known to be contrary to reality on that date?
Why must a report identify any real property interest that is being excluded from the value opinion?
Which review best helps explain divergent cost, sales-comparison and income indications?
Two value indications are $340,000 and $392,000. What is the difference as a percentage of the lower indication, rounded to one decimal place?
An unauthorized third party requests a lender-client’s report. No due-process or other permitted disclosure exception applies. How should the appraiser respond?
An appraiser proposes to assume there are no hidden defects. Which fact would characterize that assumption as extraordinary under the USPAP 2024 definition, rather than justify dismissing it as routine boilerplate?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Previous Question
Two independently supported approaches give nearly identical indications. What does their numerical agreement establish by itself?
Next Question
In a market-value Appraisal Report, a verified subject sale eighteen months before the effective date is far below the current opinion. What should the appraiser do?