A general assumption that the property has no hidden defects differs from an extraordinary assumption in that the general assumption:
Correct Answer
D) Is a routine condition disclosed in the report's boilerplate
Why this is correct: Is a routine condition disclosed in the report's boilerplate. A general assumption (e.g., no hidden defects) is a standard condition for any appraisal with a typical inspection. An extraordinary assumption is specific and, if false, would alter the conclusion, requiring prominent disclosure. Why the other choices are wrong: Requires the client's written approval applies to hypothetical conditions, not general assumptions. Must be reported prominently and could alter the value if false describes an extraordinary assumption. Applies only to properties older than fifty years is not a defining characteristic. Exam tip: General assumptions are routine; extraordinary assumptions are specific and value-significant.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
A general assumption is a routine background condition applying to appraisals generally and is disclosed among the report's standard limiting conditions.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Requires the client's written approval before it is used
Client approval is not required for general assumptions, which are standard conditions of the appraisal process.
Option B: Must be reported prominently and could alter the value if false
Prominent disclosure and the potential to alter the value if false are the defining features of an extraordinary assumption, not a general one.
Option C: Applies only to properties older than fifty years
General assumptions apply regardless of a property's age. No age threshold governs their use.
Would Being Wrong Change the Value?
Would Being Wrong Change the Value? If yes and it is specific to this job, it is extraordinary.
How to use: Apply the two-part test: specific to this assignment, and consequential if false.
Exam Tip
Distinguish both from a hypothetical condition, which is contrary to a known fact rather than merely uncertain.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Treating every assumption as extraordinary
- -Burying an extraordinary assumption in boilerplate
- -Confusing an extraordinary assumption with a hypothetical condition
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
USPAP distinguishes sharply between routine assumptions and extraordinary ones, and the test is consequence. A general assumption β that the property has no hidden defects, that title is good, that information from public records is accurate β is a background condition of virtually every appraisal, is not specific to the assignment, and is disclosed in the report's standard limiting conditions. An extraordinary assumption is different in kind: it is directly related to the specific assignment, it is uncertain, and if it proved false the appraiser's opinions or conclusions would change. That last element is what triggers the heightened treatment β an extraordinary assumption must be identified as such, its use must be reasonable, and it must be disclosed prominently rather than buried in boilerplate. The practical discipline is to ask whether the assumption is specific to this assignment and whether being wrong about it would change the value. Two yeses make it extraordinary.
Background Knowledge
USPAP defines an extraordinary assumption as one directly related to a specific assignment which, if found false, could alter the appraiser's opinions or conclusions. General assumptions are routine conditions disclosed among standard limiting conditions.
Real-World Application
An appraiser lists the no-hidden-defects assumption in standard limiting conditions but discloses prominently the extraordinary assumption that a pending zoning change will be approved.
More reconciliation Questions
An appraiser is told the property has no environmental contamination and cannot verify it. How should this be handled?
Reconciliation of the approaches to value is best described as which activity?
Significant appraisal assistance from a person who does not sign the report must be treated how?
In appraising a hotel as a going concern, what must be allocated?
What does it mean to say an approach is not applicable to an assignment?
Which of the following is a written report option named in the current edition of USPAP?
What distinguishes qualitative from quantitative analysis in the sales comparison approach?
Why should the reconciliation address the quantity of evidence as well as its quality?
An appraisal report includes an addendum explaining the adjustment derivation. How does this affect compliance?
An extraordinary assumption proves false after the report is delivered. What follows?
People Also Study
Valuation Principles & Procedures
25% of exam
Property Description & Analysis
20% of exam
Market Analysis & Highest/Best Use
15% of exam
Appraisal Math & Statistics
15% of exam
USPAP (Ethics & Standards)
15% of exam
