What is the purpose of reconciliation in a real-property appraisal?
Correct Answer
A) Evaluate the support and applicability of indications to reach the value conclusion.
Reconciliation evaluates the quality and quantity of evidence and the applicability and relevance of the methods used. The number of developed approaches does not dictate equal weights or require all three in every assignment. The reported conclusion must follow the analysis.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option A is correct because reconciliation evaluates the support and applicability of the indications to reach the value conclusion. USPAP describes reconciling the quality and quantity of data and the applicability and relevance of the approaches used. The conclusion then follows from that analysis.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B: Replace analysis with the arithmetic mean of three approaches.
Option B, replacing analysis with the arithmetic mean of three approaches, describes mechanical averaging. Reconciliation is the analysis itself, not a substitute for it.
Option C: Ensure that the highest indication becomes the conclusion.
Option C, ensuring the highest indication becomes the conclusion, sets a fixed rule that ignores evidence. The highest figure is not entitled to more weight for being highest.
Option D: Require development of all three approaches in each assignment, relevant or not.
Option D says reconciliation requires developing all three approaches in each assignment whether relevant or not, but the scope of work determines which approaches are needed. Reconciliation weighs the approaches actually used.
Reconcile means evaluate, then conclude
Reconciliation evaluates the indications' support, then concludes on value.
How to use: Use this to identify the purpose of reconciliation among answer choices.
Exam Tip
Choose the answer about evaluating support and applicability; answers about formulas, highest figures or mandatory approaches describe something else.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Thinking reconciliation means averaging
- -Believing all three approaches are required in each assignment
- -Giving the highest indication priority
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the basic purpose of reconciliation. Reconciliation evaluates the support and applicability of the indications in order to reach the value conclusion. It does not replace analysis with a formula or require all three approaches regardless of relevance.
Background Knowledge
Reconciliation is the step in which the appraiser evaluates the indications developed and reaches a value conclusion. It considers data quality and quantity and the relevance of each method. The number of approaches developed does not dictate equal weights.
Real-World Application
For a vacant lot, an appraiser develops only the sales comparison approach because cost and income approaches are not relevant. She reconciles the adjusted land sales by their similarity to the subject. The conclusion follows from that evaluation.
More Reconciliation Questions
In a cost approach for an improved property, an appraiser estimates site value by sales comparison, allocation and extraction, then settles on one site-value figure before final reconciliation. How is this step best described?
An extraordinary assumption was reasonably supported, properly used and disclosed in an appraisal report. Later, the assumed information is found to be false. Which conclusion is best supported?
An otherwise applicable valuation approach cannot be developed reliably from the available data. The remaining scope can produce credible assignment results. What should the appraiser do?
May an appraiser use a hypothetical condition in any assignment?
An appraisal has a current effective date and permits an extraordinary assumption if its requirements are met. Which situation involves uncertain information rather than a fact known to be contrary to reality on that date?
Why must a report identify any real property interest that is being excluded from the value opinion?
Which review best helps explain divergent cost, sales-comparison and income indications?
Two value indications are $340,000 and $392,000. What is the difference as a percentage of the lower indication, rounded to one decimal place?
An unauthorized third party requests a lender-client’s report. No due-process or other permitted disclosure exception applies. How should the appraiser respond?
An appraiser proposes to assume there are no hidden defects. Which fact would characterize that assumption as extraordinary under the USPAP 2024 definition, rather than justify dismissing it as routine boilerplate?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam