EstatePass
sales-comparison-approacheasy

In reconciliation, the appraiser weighs each indication primarily by:

Correct Answer

B) The reliability of its data and the extent of adjustment required

Why this is correct: Reconciliation weighs each value indication by the reliability of its data and the extent of adjustment required. Less adjustment and verified data increase confidence. Why the other choices are wrong: The recency of the sale date, regardless of any other factor is wrong; recency matters but isn't sole factor. The number of comparables that produced a similar figure is part of weighting but not primary. Whichever indication is closest to the contract price on the subject is inappropriate; contract price isn't a weighting criterion. Exam tip: Weight comparables by data quality and similarity, not by outcome.

Answer Options
A
The recency of the sale date, regardless of any other factor
B
The reliability of its data and the extent of adjustment required
C
The number of comparables that produced a similar figure
D
Whichever indication is closest to the contract price on the subject

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Why this is correct: Reconciliation weighs each value indication by the reliability of its data and the extent of adjustment required. Less adjustment and verified data increase confidence. Why the other choices are wrong: The recency of the sale date, regardless of any other factor is wrong; recency matters but isn't sole factor. The number of comparables that produced a similar figure is part of weighting but not primary. Whichever indication is closest to the contract price on the subject is inappropriate; contract price isn't a weighting criterion. Exam tip: Weight comparables by data quality and similarity, not by outcome.

Was this explanation helpful?

More sales-comparison-approach Questions

Excess land differs from surplus land in that excess land:

A subject property has a 3-car attached garage. The appraiser locates two valid paired sales: Sale 1 (with 3-car garage) sold for $512,000; Sale 2 (with 2-car garage) sold for $497,600. Both properties are otherwise identical β€” same age, quality, GLA, lot size, and neighborhood β€” and sold 5 days apart in a balanced market. The appraiser also confirms via public records and listing photos that no other functional or physical differences exist. What is the indicated contributory value of the *third* garage stall?

The most appropriate unit of comparison is determined by:

An appraiser analyzes three paired sales to isolate the effect of a fireplace. In Pair 1, the property with a fireplace sold for $12,000 more; in Pair 2, $10,500 more; and in Pair 3, $13,500 more. All pairs are highly similar and recent. The appraiser selects $12,000 as the final adjustment. Which principle best supports this selection?

A paired sales analysis yields an adjustment of βˆ’$15,000 for a property located on a busy arterial street. Later, the appraiser discovers that all three paired properties with arterial exposure also had 20% smaller lots than their non-arterial counterparts β€” a difference not initially controlled for. What is the most appropriate action per USPAP?

An appraiser identifies two comparable sales that are identical in all respects except that Sale #1 has a finished basement (1,200 sq ft) and sold for $432,000, while Sale #2 has an unfinished basement of the same size and sold for $408,000. Both sales occurred within three weeks of each other in a stable market. The appraiser intends to apply a per-square-foot adjustment for basement finish to the subject property, which has a 1,000 sq ft finished basement. What is the appropriate paired-sales-derived adjustment amount per square foot for a finished basement?

Three sales support $520,000; the borrower's purchase contract is $505,000. May the appraisal conclude above the contract price?

An appraiser develops a $3,200 adjustment for a fireplace based on a single paired sale. The subject has a fireplace; Comparable A does not. The appraiser applies +$3,200 to Comparable A. Later, the appraiser identifies a second pair showing a $4,600 fireplace contribution. The appraiser replaces the original adjustment with $3,900 β€” the simple average β€” and applies it to Comparable A. What is the appropriate USPAP-compliant action regarding the adjustment amount?

A comparable sold for $300,000 with the seller carrying a loan 2 points below market, a benefit worth $8,000. What is its cash-equivalent price?

Three comparables adjust to $412,000 (gross adj. 5%), $405,000 (gross adj. 22%), and $410,000 (gross adj. 8%). What is the best-supported value conclusion?

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing