In a market with rising rents and falling vacancy, what is likely for new construction?
Correct Answer
B) Development may increase if supported revenues cover costs and required return
Rising supported rents and lower vacancy can improve expected operating economics, but new supply still depends on costs, available land, approvals, financing and required return. The indicators can encourage construction when a feasible risk-adjusted return is supported.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option B is correct because rising supported rents and lower vacancy can improve expected revenues, which may encourage development when those revenues cover costs and the required return. New supply still depends on costs, land, approvals, financing and a feasible risk-adjusted return.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Construction will decline as rising rents reduce tenant demand in the market
Option A is wrong because it misreads the signal: rising rents with falling vacancy indicate strong, not weakening, tenant demand. Those conditions tend to encourage rather than reduce construction.
Option C: Construction will stay unchanged until vacancy reaches zero in the area
Option C is wrong because construction does not wait until vacancy reaches zero in the area. Development decisions respond to expected feasibility, and falling vacancy with rising rents can encourage building well before vacancy hits zero.
Option D: Development depends on the current interest rate rather than rents or vacancy
Option D is wrong because development does not depend on the current interest rate rather than rents or vacancy. Interest rates affect financing costs, but rents and vacancy drive the expected revenues that make a project feasible.
Rents rise, cranes may follow
Rising rents and falling vacancy can bring cranes, but only when the numbers cover costs and a required return.
How to use: Use this to link market signals to development while remembering feasibility still has to work.
Exam Tip
Prefer the answer that ties construction to feasibility; options claiming construction falls or waits for zero vacancy misread the signals.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Thinking rising rents reduce tenant demand and construction
- -Assuming builders wait for zero vacancy
- -Ignoring costs and required return when judging development feasibility
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests how market signals such as rising rents and falling vacancy relate to new construction. Those signals can improve expected operating economics, but development still occurs only when revenues are expected to cover costs and a required return.
Background Knowledge
Real estate supply responds to market signals with a lag. Rising rents and falling vacancy suggest demand is outpacing supply, which can make new projects feasible if expected income covers development costs and the required return. Feasibility analysis weighs revenue, costs, financing, land availability and approvals together.
Real-World Application
An appraiser reviewing an apartment market sees rents up and vacancy down over two years, and several new projects in planning. The appraiser considers that this pipeline may add supply and moderate rent growth once completed, and reflects it in the market analysis.
More Market Questions
In market area analysis, what characteristic distinguishes a district from a neighborhood?
Under USPAP Standards Rule 1-3(a), which item must an appraiser identify and analyze when necessary for credible results in a market value assignment?
How does the Fannie Mae Selling Guide define a neighborhood?
Several homes in a neighborhood are vacant and boarded up. Which market force does Fannie Mae classify this as?
Infrastructure investment such as a new interchange typically affects nearby land by:
A city raises property tax rates and tightens building regulations. Which market force does Fannie Mae classify these as?
An appraiser believes, without market evidence, that a nearby group home lowers values. What does Fannie Mae require?
Which three categories are used to report the supply of properties in a Fannie Mae neighborhood section?
An appraiser is asked for a retrospective value opinion as of three years ago. When must the appraiser meet the Competency Rule?
Can mixed land uses in a residential neighborhood ever enhance home values, according to Fannie Mae?
People Also Study
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
Which factor tends to make demand for a particular product more price elastic?
Next Question
A developer can build one to six stories on a site. Each added story costs $500,000. Market analysis shows the value each added story contributes: 2nd story $700,000; 3rd story $800,000; 4th story $540,000; 5th story $430,000; 6th story $330,000. Under the principle of increasing and decreasing returns, what height is economically justified?