In a market saturated with bank-owned sales, an appraiser valuing a typical resale should treat REO transactions as:
Correct Answer
B) Evidence to analyze — usable with care when they define the subject's market
Why this is correct: REO (bank-owned) sales are market transactions and must be considered as evidence. When they dominate the market, they define the market conditions. However, each must be analyzed for possible distress discounts or atypical terms; they are usable with appropriate care and adjustments. Why the other choices are wrong: "Automatically the best comparables, since they dominate the sales volume" ignores that they may not be the most similar or may require adjustment. "Automatically excluded in every analysis" would ignore relevant market evidence. "Equal to normal sales with no scrutiny" fails to recognize potential atypical conditions. Exam tip: Treat distressed sales as market evidence; analyze, adjust, or exclude based on specific facts, not blanket rules.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Why this is correct: REO (bank-owned) sales are market transactions and must be considered as evidence. When they dominate the market, they define the market conditions. However, each must be analyzed for possible distress discounts or atypical terms; they are usable with appropriate care and adjustments. Why the other choices are wrong: "Automatically the best comparables, since they dominate the sales volume" ignores that they may not be the most similar or may require adjustment. "Automatically excluded in every analysis" would ignore relevant market evidence. "Equal to normal sales with no scrutiny" fails to recognize potential atypical conditions. Exam tip: Treat distressed sales as market evidence; analyze, adjust, or exclude based on specific facts, not blanket rules.
More sales-comparison-approach Questions
Excess land differs from surplus land in that excess land:
A subject property has a 3-car attached garage. The appraiser locates two valid paired sales: Sale 1 (with 3-car garage) sold for $512,000; Sale 2 (with 2-car garage) sold for $497,600. Both properties are otherwise identical — same age, quality, GLA, lot size, and neighborhood — and sold 5 days apart in a balanced market. The appraiser also confirms via public records and listing photos that no other functional or physical differences exist. What is the indicated contributory value of the *third* garage stall?
The most appropriate unit of comparison is determined by:
An appraiser analyzes three paired sales to isolate the effect of a fireplace. In Pair 1, the property with a fireplace sold for $12,000 more; in Pair 2, $10,500 more; and in Pair 3, $13,500 more. All pairs are highly similar and recent. The appraiser selects $12,000 as the final adjustment. Which principle best supports this selection?
A paired sales analysis yields an adjustment of −$15,000 for a property located on a busy arterial street. Later, the appraiser discovers that all three paired properties with arterial exposure also had 20% smaller lots than their non-arterial counterparts — a difference not initially controlled for. What is the most appropriate action per USPAP?
An appraiser identifies two comparable sales that are identical in all respects except that Sale #1 has a finished basement (1,200 sq ft) and sold for $432,000, while Sale #2 has an unfinished basement of the same size and sold for $408,000. Both sales occurred within three weeks of each other in a stable market. The appraiser intends to apply a per-square-foot adjustment for basement finish to the subject property, which has a 1,000 sq ft finished basement. What is the appropriate paired-sales-derived adjustment amount per square foot for a finished basement?
Three sales support $520,000; the borrower's purchase contract is $505,000. May the appraisal conclude above the contract price?
An appraiser develops a $3,200 adjustment for a fireplace based on a single paired sale. The subject has a fireplace; Comparable A does not. The appraiser applies +$3,200 to Comparable A. Later, the appraiser identifies a second pair showing a $4,600 fireplace contribution. The appraiser replaces the original adjustment with $3,900 — the simple average — and applies it to Comparable A. What is the appropriate USPAP-compliant action regarding the adjustment amount?
A comparable sold for $300,000 with the seller carrying a loan 2 points below market, a benefit worth $8,000. What is its cash-equivalent price?
Three comparables adjust to $412,000 (gross adj. 5%), $405,000 (gross adj. 22%), and $410,000 (gross adj. 8%). What is the best-supported value conclusion?
People Also Study
Valuation Principles & Procedures
25% of exam
Property Description & Analysis
20% of exam
Market Analysis & Highest/Best Use
15% of exam
Appraisal Math & Statistics
15% of exam
USPAP (Ethics & Standards)
15% of exam
Previous Question
A comparable sold for $310,000 and has a garage the subject lacks, worth $12,000. The comparable also lacks the subject's $5,000 deck. What is the adjusted price?
Next Question
A pool adds $15,000 in one neighborhood but only $5,000 in a colder market two hours away. What principle does this illustrate?
