How is the value of excess land normally estimated?
Correct Answer
C) On its own highest and best use as a parcel
Excess land can have a separate highest and best use because it is not required to support the primary use and can support independent use or sale. Surplus land lacks that independent marketable use and is valued for its contribution to the overall property. Neither classification is established by arithmetic alone.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option C is correct because excess land is land not needed to support the existing improvement or the site's highest and best use, and it can support independent use or sale. It is therefore valued according to its own highest and best use as a separate parcel.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: As a proportion of the primary site's value
Option A values excess land as a proportion of the primary site's value. Excess land has its own potential use, so its value is not derived as a fixed share of the primary site.
Option B: At the same unit rate as the primary site
Option B applies the same unit rate as the primary site. Excess land may have a different highest and best use, size or utility, so its unit value can differ from the primary site's.
Option D: By deducting it from the total property value
Option D deducts excess land from total property value. That describes no recognized valuation method; excess land is valued on its own use and added as a separate component.
Excess can exit, surplus stays
Excess land can leave the parcel and stand alone as its own site; surplus land stays attached and only adds to the main property.
How to use: Use this to decide whether extra land is valued separately or as a contribution.
Exam Tip
Excess land points to a separate highest and best use; surplus land points to contributory value.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Confusing excess land with surplus land
- -Valuing extra land at the primary site's unit rate without support
- -Classifying land as excess based only on area
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the distinction between excess land and surplus land. Excess land is not needed for the primary use and can be sold or used separately, so it may have its own highest and best use. That separate use is the basis for valuing it.
Background Knowledge
A parcel may have more land than its improvement or highest and best use needs. Excess land can be separated and has independent value, while surplus land cannot be separately developed or sold and is valued for its contribution to the whole property.
Real-World Application
A house sits on a large parcel with a separately accessible back acre that could be split off and sold as a building lot. The appraiser treats that acre as excess land and values it based on its own highest and best use.
More Land/Site Questions
How should an appraiser account for a site's access to public sewer compared with competing sites that require septic systems?
Which fact, if supported by competitive-market evidence, most directly supports a unit-price premium for an otherwise comparable site?
A rectangular site's frontage is doubled while its depth is halved, keeping area constant. What is the likely value effect in a retail district?
A downtown site's zoning height limit is reduced from six stories to three. Buyers in this market had been paying for six-story development potential. What effect on land value is most supportable?
A zoning change increases permitted density from four to eight units per acre. What is the likely effect on site value?
Using the allocation method, market evidence supports a typical land-to-total-property-value ratio of 28% for similar improved properties in the subject’s location. An improved comparable sold for $825,000. What land (site) contribution is indicated by applying that ratio?
An appraiser is valuing a vacant site near a landfill. A similar vacant site that is not affected by the landfill sold for $480,000. Paired land sales indicate that proximity to the landfill lowers site prices by $70,000. No other adjustments apply. What is the indicated value of the subject site?
An appraiser is extracting site value from a $600,000 cash sale. The seller's records show an original construction cost of $250,000 and a depreciated book value of $110,000. The appraiser estimates current replacement cost new at $400,000 and accrued depreciation from all causes at $100,000. What is the indicated site value?
Three parcels assembled under single ownership (standard appraisal guidance assemblage) support separate as-is values of $290,000, $340,000, and $250,000. After assemblage for a higher-utility use, the combined site is valued at $1,050,000. Assemblage costs (demolition, legal, holding, and related) total $55,000. What is the indicated net plottage (plottage increment after assemblage costs)?
A comparable commercial site with 65 front feet sold for a cash-equivalent price of $585,000. Per standard appraisal guidance, sale price per front foot is a vacant-land unit of comparison when frontage is a primary value determinant. The subject site has 72 front feet and is otherwise similar. What indicated land value does the front-foot unit support before other adjustments?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
A property produces net operating income of $240,000. The building is worth $1,500,000 and is capitalized at 9 percent, and the land capitalization rate is 7 percent. The income, building value and rates all reflect the market. What land value does the land residual technique indicate?
Next Question
When choosing between sale price per front foot and sale price per square foot as the unit of comparison for vacant land, which approach is correct?