For a proposed retail site whose competitive market depends strongly on passing-customer exposure, which listed datum most directly measures that exposure?
Correct Answer
A) The traffic count passing the location
Traffic count can inform exposure and customer access for the stated retail use, alongside traffic direction, entry restrictions, visibility and actual customer demand. It is one relevant datum, not proof that higher counts always raise value or that surrounding households and other context never matter.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option A is correct because the traffic count passing the location directly measures the flow of potential customers who see the site. For retail uses that rely on passing customers, this is the most direct exposure measure among the choices. It is one relevant datum, and the count should be suitable for the retail type.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B: The age of the nearest residential homes
Option B, the age of the nearest residential homes, describes neighborhood housing stock. It does not measure how many customers pass the retail site.
Option C: The school district the site falls within
Option C, the school district the site falls within, matters mainly for residential demand. It does not measure passing-customer exposure for a retail location.
Option D: The number of bedrooms zoning would allow
Option D, the number of bedrooms zoning would allow, relates to residential density, not retail exposure. It does not measure traffic passing the site.
Count the Cars Going By
Exposure is about who passes by. Traffic counts measure exactly that.
How to use: Use this to identify exposure-related data in retail site questions.
Exam Tip
Match the data item to the specific factor asked about. For exposure, choose traffic flow rather than residential characteristics.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Assuming higher traffic counts always mean higher value
- -Ignoring access restrictions and traffic direction
- -Relying on residential characteristics to measure retail exposure
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests which data item most directly measures passing-customer exposure for a retail site. Exposure depends on how many potential customers pass the location. Traffic count measures that flow, though it is considered alongside direction, access, visibility and demand.
Background Knowledge
Retail site analysis considers exposure, visibility, access and the surrounding customer base. Traffic counts measure vehicle flow past a location and help gauge exposure. Their usefulness depends on the retail type, traffic direction, ingress and egress and actual customer demand.
Real-World Application
An appraiser analyzes a proposed convenience store site on an arterial road. The appraiser reviews published traffic counts, the side of the road serving commuters, access points and visibility, then compares these with competing sites.
More Land/Site Questions
How should an appraiser account for a site's access to public sewer compared with competing sites that require septic systems?
Which fact, if supported by competitive-market evidence, most directly supports a unit-price premium for an otherwise comparable site?
A rectangular site's frontage is doubled while its depth is halved, keeping area constant. What is the likely value effect in a retail district?
A downtown site's zoning height limit is reduced from six stories to three. Buyers in this market had been paying for six-story development potential. What effect on land value is most supportable?
A zoning change increases permitted density from four to eight units per acre. What is the likely effect on site value?
Using the allocation method, market evidence supports a typical land-to-total-property-value ratio of 28% for similar improved properties in the subject’s location. An improved comparable sold for $825,000. What land (site) contribution is indicated by applying that ratio?
An appraiser is valuing a vacant site near a landfill. A similar vacant site that is not affected by the landfill sold for $480,000. Paired land sales indicate that proximity to the landfill lowers site prices by $70,000. No other adjustments apply. What is the indicated value of the subject site?
An appraiser is extracting site value from a $600,000 cash sale. The seller's records show an original construction cost of $250,000 and a depreciated book value of $110,000. The appraiser estimates current replacement cost new at $400,000 and accrued depreciation from all causes at $100,000. What is the indicated site value?
Three parcels assembled under single ownership (standard appraisal guidance assemblage) support separate as-is values of $290,000, $340,000, and $250,000. After assemblage for a higher-utility use, the combined site is valued at $1,050,000. Assemblage costs (demolition, legal, holding, and related) total $55,000. What is the indicated net plottage (plottage increment after assemblage costs)?
A comparable commercial site with 65 front feet sold for a cash-equivalent price of $585,000. Per standard appraisal guidance, sale price per front foot is a vacant-land unit of comparison when frontage is a primary value determinant. The subject site has 72 front feet and is otherwise similar. What indicated land value does the front-foot unit support before other adjustments?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
An appraiser is valuing a vacant site near a gypsum manufacturing plant. A comparable vacant site that is not near such a plant sold for $910,000, and paired land sales show a $150,000 discount for proximity to the plant. No other adjustments are needed. What is the indicated land value of the subject?
Next Question
Vacant land may be valued by a multi-comparable median unit price ($/acre) applied to the subject’s acreage. Five similar vacant comps support unit prices of $88,000, $95,000, $98,000, $102,000, and $110,000 per acre. Subject contains 7.5 acres. What indicated land value by median $/acre results?