Comparing a subject's market area to a competing one is useful because it:
Correct Answer
B) Establishes where the subject sits in the broader market
Compare supported buyer alternatives, utility and price evidence across relevant areas to understand the subject’s competitive position. This can inform a location adjustment when differences are isolated; it does not eliminate comparable sales or directly establish assessed or insurance values.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option B is correct because comparing market areas shows where the subject sits within the broader market, relative to the alternatives buyers actually consider. Fannie Mae directs the appraiser to examine the subject's market area and identify similar comparable sales. Understanding competitive position can also support a location adjustment when differences are isolated.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Determines the subject's assessed value
Option A says the comparison determines the subject's assessed value, which is wrong. Assessed value is set by a taxing authority under its own procedures, not by an appraiser's market-area comparison.
Option C: Eliminates the need for comparable sales
Option C says the comparison eliminates the need for comparable sales, which is wrong. Comparing market areas helps choose and adjust comparables; it does not replace them.
Option D: Sets the property's insurance replacement cost estimate
Option D says the comparison sets the property's insurance replacement cost estimate, which is wrong. Replacement cost for insurance comes from cost data for the improvements, not from comparing market areas.
Where it stands
Comparing market areas tells you where the subject stands among the choices buyers actually have.
How to use: Use this to pick the answer about competitive position rather than tax, insurance or replacing comparables.
Exam Tip
Market-area comparisons support comparable selection and location analysis; they do not produce assessed values or insurance figures.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Using market-area comparisons in place of comparable sales
- -Confusing market analysis with tax assessment
- -Applying location adjustments without isolating the difference
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the purpose of comparing a subject's market area with competing areas. Buyers weigh alternatives across areas, so comparing them shows the subject's competitive position in the broader market. That comparison informs comparable selection and possible location adjustments, but it does not set assessed or insurance values or replace sales data.
Background Knowledge
Market area analysis identifies where competing properties and likely buyers are found. Comparing the subject's area with competing areas reveals differences in price levels, amenities and demand. This helps the appraiser select comparables and decide whether location adjustments are supported by market evidence.
Real-World Application
An appraiser finds that buyers looking at the subject's subdivision also shop a newer subdivision across the highway. By comparing sale prices and amenities in both areas, the appraiser understands the subject's competitive position and decides whether comparables from the other area need a location adjustment.
More Market Questions
In market area analysis, what characteristic distinguishes a district from a neighborhood?
Under USPAP Standards Rule 1-3(a), which item must an appraiser identify and analyze when necessary for credible results in a market value assignment?
How does the Fannie Mae Selling Guide define a neighborhood?
Several homes in a neighborhood are vacant and boarded up. Which market force does Fannie Mae classify this as?
Infrastructure investment such as a new interchange typically affects nearby land by:
A city raises property tax rates and tightens building regulations. Which market force does Fannie Mae classify these as?
An appraiser believes, without market evidence, that a nearby group home lowers values. What does Fannie Mae require?
Which three categories are used to report the supply of properties in a Fannie Mae neighborhood section?
An appraiser is asked for a retrospective value opinion as of three years ago. When must the appraiser meet the Competency Rule?
Can mixed land uses in a residential neighborhood ever enhance home values, according to Fannie Mae?
People Also Study
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
Census Bureau data for a region show new-home sales at seasonally adjusted annual rates (SAAR) of 594,000 in January, 627,000 in February and 660,000 in March, a rise of 33,000 each month. At the end of March, 495,000 new houses are for sale. Using the Census months'-supply definition and the current (March) sales rate, what months' supply is indicated? Round to one decimal place.
Next Question
In rental-market analysis, what is meant by frictional vacancy?