Comparable sales should ideally be verified with:
Correct Answer
A) A party to the transaction, such as a broker or principal
Why this is correct: Ideal verification involves contacting a party to the transaction (e.g., broker, buyer, seller) to confirm the sale terms, conditions, and motivations, which are not recorded in public documents. Why the other choices are wrong: The county assessor's notice or an automated valuation model (AVM) output are secondary sources that may not reflect the actual transaction details. Listing photographs do not verify sale terms. Exam tip: For the best verification, go to a source with firsthand knowledge of the deal.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Verifying with a party to the transaction, such as a broker on either side or a principal, reaches the only people with firsthand knowledge of terms, motivations, and conditions of sale. That conversation is what lets the appraiser confirm the price actually paid, learn about concessions or unusual financing that require adjustment, establish the property's condition at the time, and confirm that the sale was exposed to the market rather than negotiated privately between related parties. It also frequently uncovers the reason a sale is an outlier, which either rescues the comparable or justifies excluding it. The appraiser then names the verification source in the report so a reader can weigh the reliability of each data point.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B: The county assessor's published annual valuation notice
An assessor's annual valuation notice states an assessed value produced by a mass appraisal system for taxation, which is neither a transaction price nor a description of the terms of any sale. Assessment values also lag the market by design and are often computed on a fractional basis, so they cannot confirm anything about a specific deal.
Option C: An automated valuation model's output
An automated valuation model returns an estimate generated from public and aggregated data, so it is another opinion of value rather than a fact about the transaction. Using one to verify a sale would be circular, since the model itself relies on the same unverified records the appraiser is trying to confirm.
Option D: The listing photographs archived online
Archived listing photographs can help establish condition and features at a point in time, which is genuinely useful supporting information, but they say nothing about price, terms, concessions, or the relationship between the parties. Photographs supplement verification rather than accomplish it.
Ask Someone Who Was There
Public records tell you a price. Only a person who was in the room tells you what the price means. Verification means asking someone who was there.
How to use: For any verification question, rank sources by proximity to the deal. A principal or their broker is first, a closing statement second, recorded documents third, and anything computed by a model is not verification at all.
Exam Tip
Distinguish confirming that a sale happened from verifying its terms; the exam credits the source that can speak to terms and motivations.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Using a sale straight from a data service without confirming terms with a party to the deal
- -Failing to identify the verification source for each comparable in the report
- -Missing seller concessions or personal property that inflate the recorded price
- -Treating an assessed value or an automated estimate as confirmation of a transaction
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This tests verification, which is the step that turns raw sale data into usable comparable evidence. STANDARD 1 requires the appraiser to analyze such comparable sales data as are available and to avoid errors that significantly affect results, and a sale used without verification may not be what it appears. Recorded documents and data services give you a price and a date, but they rarely reveal whether the transaction was arm's length, whether concessions or seller financing affected the price, whether the parties were related, whether personal property or business value was included, what condition the property was in on the date of sale, and how long it was exposed to the market. Only someone who was in the deal can answer those questions. That is why verification with a party to the transaction is the professional standard, and why the appraisal report identifies the verification source for each comparable.
Background Knowledge
You need to know that STANDARD 1 requires competent analysis of comparable data and that comparables must be verified for terms and conditions of sale. You should also know the elements verification is meant to establish, including arm's-length status, financing and concessions, personal property included, property condition at sale, exposure time, and the motivations of the parties, and that the report identifies the verification source.
Real-World Application
A recorded sale looks fifteen percent below the neighborhood pattern, so you call the listing broker, who explains that the seller paid nine thousand dollars in closing costs and left appliances and a tractor with the property, and that the buyer was the seller's nephew. You document the conversation, adjust for the concessions and personal property, note the relationship, and conclude that the sale is not arm's length and should be excluded, stating your verification source and reasoning in the report.
More Sales Comparison Questions
Excess land differs from surplus land in that excess land:
A paired sales analysis reveals that homes with stainless-steel appliances sell for $2,100 more than identical homes with standard appliances — but only when the homes are priced below $350,000. In the subject’s neighborhood, median sale price is $410,000. What is the appraiser’s obligation regarding the $2,100 appliance adjustment?
GLA differs by 210 sq ft between subject and comparable. Paired sales support $65 per sq ft of living area. The line adjustment is:
Paired sales are drawn from transactions six months apart in a stable market. The time adjustment needed is:
The most appropriate unit of comparison is determined by:
A comparable superior to the subject in every adjusted category should produce an indication that is:
Three sales support $520,000; the borrower's purchase contract is $505,000. May the appraisal conclude above the contract price?
A comparable sold for $300,000 with the seller carrying a loan 2 points below market, a benefit worth $8,000. What is its cash-equivalent price?
Why is a foreclosure sale generally a poor comparable in a stable market?
A comparable sold 8 months ago for $250,000 in a market appreciating 6% per year. What is the time-adjusted price?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam