EstatePass
Sales ComparisonEASY16.4% of exam

Comparable 2, a Cape Cod home, sold for $389,000 after 21 days on the market. Under the sale contract, the seller stayed in the house for 60 days after closing without paying rent while her new home was being finished. How should the appraiser treat the rent-free occupancy?

Correct Answer

B) As a term of the sale whose effect on the price should be measured

Free occupancy after closing is something of value the buyer gave the seller as part of the deal, so it is a transactional element: the price may reflect it. The appraiser verifies the arrangement and measures its effect on the price, for example by the market rent the seller did not pay, then adjusts if the market shows an effect. It is not a physical difference, since the house is unchanged, and not a market conditions item, which measures price changes between the contract date and the effective date; the 21 days on market does not affect the answer.

Answer Options
A
As an event after closing that has no bearing on the sale price
B
As a term of the sale whose effect on the price should be measured
C
As a physical difference, because the buyer moved into the house later
D
As a market conditions item, because possession came 60 days later

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Option B is correct because the 60 days of rent-free occupancy was part of the contract and gave the seller a benefit, so the price may reflect it. The appraiser treats it as a term of the sale, verifies it, and measures from the market whether and how much it changed the price.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: As an event after closing that has no bearing on the sale price

Option A treats the stay as an event after closing with no bearing on the price. The arrangement was agreed before closing as part of the deal, so it may have shaped the price.

Option C: As a physical difference, because the buyer moved into the house later

Option C calls it a physical difference because the buyer moved in later. The house itself is the same; what differs is the deal, which makes it a transactional element.

Option D: As a market conditions item, because possession came 60 days later

Option D calls it a market conditions item because possession came 60 days later. Market conditions measure price changes between the contract date and the effective date, not a benefit one party gave the other.

Read the whole deal

Anything the buyer and seller traded besides the house and the cash, such as free occupancy, belongs in the terms of the sale.

How to use: Use it when a comparable's contract includes a rent-back, an occupancy agreement or other side terms.

Exam Tip

Classify an item by what it changes: the property, the deal or the market. A rent-back changes the deal.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • -Ignoring arrangements that take effect after closing
  • -Treating delayed possession as a market conditions adjustment
  • -Assuming the deed shows all the terms of a sale

Concept Deep Dive

Analysis

The question tests recognizing a transactional element that is not a financing term. A seller's rent-free stay after closing was agreed in the contract, so it can affect what the buyer paid and must be analyzed with the other terms of the sale.

Background Knowledge

Transactional elements of comparison include property rights conveyed, financing terms, conditions of sale, expenditures made immediately after purchase and market conditions. Arrangements such as a seller rent-back, a rent guarantee or included personal property can make the recorded price differ from a sale on typical terms.

Real-World Application

While verifying a sale with the listing agent, an appraiser learns the seller stayed in the house for two months after closing rent free. The appraiser records the arrangement, compares it with market rent for similar homes and checks whether it affected the price.

rent-backterms of saletransactional elementsverificationpost-closing occupancy
Was this explanation helpful?

More Sales Comparison Questions

Supported adjustments are: non-market financing $10,000, GLA $36/sf, garage $3,500 per car, pool/spa $12,500. A comparable identical to the 2,800 sf subject sold for $267,000 with non-market financing. What is its adjusted price?

Using GLA $36/sf and non-market financing $10,000: a 3,100 sf comparable sold for $277,000 with non-market financing; the subject has 2,800 sf. Bath count differences are not adjusted. What is the adjusted price?

Using garage $3,500 per car and pool/spa $12,500: a comparable with a 2-car garage and a pool/spa sold for $268,000. The subject has a 3-car garage and no pool. What is the adjusted price?

Using GLA $36/sf, garage $3,500 per car and pool/spa $12,500: a 2,600 sf comparable with a 2-car garage and a pool/spa sold for $264,000. The subject is 2,800 sf with a 3-car garage and no pool. What is the adjusted price?

In a neighborhood with declining values and marketing times over six months, what must Fannie Mae lenders confirm about the sales comparison analysis?

A house is a 4,000 square foot home in an area of 2,000 square foot homes. How must the appraiser treat this over-improvement in the sales comparison grid?

According to the Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines, which items should an appraisal’s market conditions discussion include?

A comparable listed at $420,000 and sold for $399,000. What sale-to-list price ratio (sale price ÷ list price) does this indicate?

An appraiser wants to describe the neighborhood boundaries in a Fannie Mae report. Which approach is acceptable?

Which of these is listed by Fannie Mae as a sales or financing concession?

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing