An appraiser observes that inventory has fallen 30% year over year while sales volume held steady. The likely implication is:
Correct Answer
D) Inventory is tighter relative to sales, warranting analysis of seller leverage
With comparable definitions and periods, lower inventory and unchanged sales pace mean fewer months of inventory. That can indicate stronger seller bargaining conditions, but does not prove price appreciation or identify the cause. Check cancellations, new supply, demand and mix before a price adjustment.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option D is correct because months of supply indicates how long current inventory would last at the current sales rate. With 30 percent less inventory and the same sales pace, inventory is tighter relative to sales, which can indicate stronger seller bargaining conditions. The appraiser should then examine new supply, demand, cancellations and mix before drawing a price conclusion.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Construction costs must rise by 30% as well
Option A, construction costs must rise by 30% as well, does not follow; lower inventory relative to sales says nothing directly about construction costs, and no rule ties them to the same percentage.
Option B: Sellers are proven to be flooding the market
Option B, sellers are proven to be flooding the market, contradicts the facts; falling inventory means fewer homes for sale, not a flood of listings.
Option C: The inventory-to-sales relationship cannot have changed, because sales were steady
Option C, the inventory-to-sales relationship cannot have changed because sales were steady, is wrong because the relationship depends on both figures; with inventory down 30 percent and sales unchanged, the ratio fell.
Less inventory, same sales: tighter
If the shelves empty faster relative to sales, the market is tighter and sellers gain leverage.
How to use: Use this to interpret changes in inventory against a steady sales pace.
Exam Tip
Choose the answer that draws a measured inference and calls for further analysis, rather than one claiming proof or a fixed numeric result.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Ignoring inventory changes when sales are steady
- -Treating a tighter market as proof of price appreciation
- -Linking inventory changes directly to construction costs
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests interpreting inventory and sales together. If inventory falls 30 percent while sales stay steady, there are fewer homes for sale relative to the sales pace, so months of supply falls. That points to a tighter market and warrants analysis of seller leverage, but it does not by itself prove price changes or explain the cause.
Background Knowledge
Months of supply relates inventory to the current sales rate. Falling inventory with steady sales lowers months of supply, which often signals a tighter market. Appraisers combine this with price trends, days on market and concessions before concluding on market conditions or adjustments.
Real-World Application
An appraiser notices active listings in a neighborhood dropped from 50 to 35 over a year while monthly sales held steady. The appraiser reports lower months of supply and reviews list-to-sale ratios and days on market to see whether sellers have gained pricing power.
More Market Questions
In market area analysis, what characteristic distinguishes a district from a neighborhood?
Under USPAP Standards Rule 1-3(a), which item must an appraiser identify and analyze when necessary for credible results in a market value assignment?
How does the Fannie Mae Selling Guide define a neighborhood?
Several homes in a neighborhood are vacant and boarded up. Which market force does Fannie Mae classify this as?
Infrastructure investment such as a new interchange typically affects nearby land by:
A city raises property tax rates and tightens building regulations. Which market force does Fannie Mae classify these as?
An appraiser believes, without market evidence, that a nearby group home lowers values. What does Fannie Mae require?
Which three categories are used to report the supply of properties in a Fannie Mae neighborhood section?
An appraiser is asked for a retrospective value opinion as of three years ago. When must the appraiser meet the Competency Rule?
Can mixed land uses in a residential neighborhood ever enhance home values, according to Fannie Mae?
People Also Study
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
A consistent market segment recorded 40 closed sales and 50 new listings during the same period. What is closed-sales/new-listings? The groups need not be one cohort, and this ratio alone does not prove net inventory change.
Next Question
For a Fannie Mae assignment using the legacy B4-1.3-03 neighborhood format, independent current market analysis supports marketing time of about 3.7 months. Which category applies, and what analysis is required if supported marketing time exceeds six months?