An appraiser is asked to assume a property is free of a known deed restriction. How should this be characterized?
Correct Answer
C) A hypothetical condition contrary to known fact
Why this is correct: A hypothetical condition assumes something contrary to known facts. Since the deed restriction is known to exist, assuming it is absent is contrary to fact, making this a hypothetical condition. Its use is permitted for legitimate purposes (e.g., litigation) with proper disclosure. Why the other choices are wrong: The choice calling it an extraordinary assumption about the title is incorrect; an extraordinary assumption is about an uncertain fact, not a known one. The choice calling it an ordinary limiting condition is wrong; limiting conditions describe the scope of work, not contrary-to-fact scenarios. The choice calling it a jurisdictional exception is false; this is a defined USPAP concept. Exam tip: Known fact false? = Hypothetical condition. Fact uncertain? = Extraordinary assumption.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option C names the condition correctly. Because the restriction is known to burden the property, valuing the property as unrestricted supposes something contrary to a known fact, which is the definition of a hypothetical condition. Its use is permissible for legitimate purposes such as litigation, condemnation, or an anticipated release of the restriction, provided the appraiser discloses it and states that its use might have affected the assignment results. Labeling it correctly matters because USPAP attaches specific disclosure duties to a hypothetical condition.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: An extraordinary assumption about the title
An extraordinary assumption applies to facts the appraiser does not know and cannot readily verify, such as an unconfirmed zoning change or an unseen crawl space. Here the deed restriction is a known, recorded fact, so nothing about it is uncertain. The choice is tempting because both are assignment conditions, but only one addresses a knowledge gap.
Option B: An ordinary limiting condition on the work
Limiting conditions are statements that define the limits of the appraiser's responsibility, such as reliance on public records or non-responsibility for hidden defects. They cannot manufacture a factual premise contrary to what the appraiser knows to be true. Burying a contrary-to-fact premise among boilerplate limiting conditions would conceal it from users rather than disclose it.
Option D: A jurisdictional exception to the Ethics Rule
A jurisdictional exception applies only when a law or regulation binding on the assignment voids a portion of USPAP, and even then the appraiser must cite the law and identify the voided part. Nothing in the stem involves a conflicting statute, and the ETHICS RULE is not being set aside. This choice confuses a legal override with a routine analytical premise.
Known False, Unknown Maybe
Ask one question: do I know the truth? If I KNOW the fact and I am told to pretend otherwise, that is Hypothetical, H for 'hide a known fact.' If I do NOT know and I am told to accept it, that is Extraordinary, E for 'expect it is true.'
How to use: When a stem uses words like known, recorded, documented, or confirmed, go straight to hypothetical condition. When it uses assume, reportedly, the client states, or unverified, go to extraordinary assumption.
Exam Tip
Scan the stem for the one word that reveals certainty. Exam writers plant 'known' or 'unverified' deliberately, and that word decides the answer before you weigh anything else.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Treating any client-supplied instruction as an extraordinary assumption without asking whether the appraiser already knows the fact
- -Disclosing the condition once in a footnote instead of clearly and conspicuously where it affects the results
- -Believing a hypothetical condition is prohibited; it is permitted when reasonable, credible, and disclosed
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This item tests the boundary between the two assignment conditions USPAP defines. A hypothetical condition is something contrary to what is known by the appraiser to exist on the effective date, or contrary to what exists but is supposed for the purpose of analysis. An extraordinary assumption, by contrast, covers information that is uncertain on the effective date and that, if found false, could alter the appraiser's opinions or conclusions. The deciding word in the stem is 'known': the deed restriction is recorded and the appraiser knows it exists, so pretending it away is contrary to fact, not a leap over uncertainty. Either condition is permitted only when its use is reasonable, the assignment results remain credible, and the condition is disclosed clearly and conspicuously in the report.
Background Knowledge
You need the USPAP definitions of extraordinary assumption and hypothetical condition and the disclosure obligations attached to each. You also need to know that a recorded deed restriction is a private encumbrance on the bundle of rights that runs with the land, making it a known characteristic of the property being appraised.
Real-World Application
An attorney orders a value of a parcel as if a covenant limiting it to agricultural use were extinguished, so the parties can measure the damage the covenant causes. The appraiser develops the opinion under a clearly labeled hypothetical condition and states in the transmittal letter and the certification that the value would differ without it.
More USPAP Questions
Reconciliation of the approaches to value is best described as which activity?
Why should the reconciliation address the quantity of evidence as well as its quality?
How long must a report be retained compared with the workfile?
What distinguishes an appraisal review from an appraisal?
An appraiser reconciles to a value at the top of the indicated range because the client needs that figure. What has occurred?
What does it mean that a value opinion must be reasonable rather than merely arithmetically derived?
What should the reconciliation section explain to the reader?
How do the content obligations of the two report options differ with respect to the information analyzed?
The three approaches indicate $480,000, $495,000 and $610,000. What should the appraiser do first?
Three approaches indicate $1.02 million, $1.05 million and $1.04 million. How should this be reported?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam