What is the final test an appraiser should apply to a reconciled value conclusion?
Correct Answer
D) Whether the evidence genuinely supports it
The concluded value must be supported by the relevant evidence and analysis for the intended use. Matching a target, choosing a midpoint or exceeding a debt balance does not establish that support. A market-value opinion should remain independent and explained.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option D is correct because the concluded value must be supported by relevant evidence and analysis for the intended use. USPAP states that credible assignment results require support by relevant evidence and logic to the degree necessary for the intended use. A value that the evidence supports is independent and defensible.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Whether it matches the client's expectation
Option A asks whether the value matches the client's expectation. Matching a target compromises independence and says nothing about support.
Option B: Whether it lies at the midpoint of the range
Option B asks whether the value lies at the midpoint of the range. A midpoint is a mechanical position, not evidence; the best-supported value may lie elsewhere in the range.
Option C: Whether it exceeds the outstanding loan balance
Option C asks whether the value exceeds the outstanding loan balance. The loan balance is not evidence of market value and is not a test of support.
Does the evidence carry it?
Before signing, ask whether the evidence alone would lead a reader to this number.
How to use: Use this question as the last check on any reconciled value.
Exam Tip
The final test is support by evidence. Options about client wishes, midpoints or loan amounts are distractors.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Aiming for the client's expected value
- -Defaulting to the midpoint of the range
- -Using the loan balance as a benchmark of value
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the final check on a reconciled value. The question to ask is whether the evidence genuinely supports the conclusion. Targets, midpoints and loan balances are not tests of support.
Background Knowledge
Credibility depends on relevant evidence and logical analysis. The final review of a conclusion asks whether a reasonable reader could follow the evidence to that value.
Real-World Application
A borrower needs a value of at least $500,000 to refinance. The appraiser's evidence supports $485,000, and she reports that figure with her reasoning rather than adjusting to meet the target.
More Reconciliation Questions
In a cost approach for an improved property, an appraiser estimates site value by sales comparison, allocation and extraction, then settles on one site-value figure before final reconciliation. How is this step best described?
An extraordinary assumption was reasonably supported, properly used and disclosed in an appraisal report. Later, the assumed information is found to be false. Which conclusion is best supported?
An otherwise applicable valuation approach cannot be developed reliably from the available data. The remaining scope can produce credible assignment results. What should the appraiser do?
May an appraiser use a hypothetical condition in any assignment?
An appraisal has a current effective date and permits an extraordinary assumption if its requirements are met. Which situation involves uncertain information rather than a fact known to be contrary to reality on that date?
Why must a report identify any real property interest that is being excluded from the value opinion?
Which review best helps explain divergent cost, sales-comparison and income indications?
Two value indications are $340,000 and $392,000. What is the difference as a percentage of the lower indication, rounded to one decimal place?
An unauthorized third party requests a lender-client’s report. No due-process or other permitted disclosure exception applies. How should the appraiser respond?
An appraiser proposes to assume there are no hidden defects. Which fact would characterize that assumption as extraordinary under the USPAP 2024 definition, rather than justify dismissing it as routine boilerplate?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Previous Question
For a 24-unit apartment building, the appraiser finds numerous sales of closely comparable buildings with well-confirmed prices, but reliable income and expense data from just two comparable properties. How should the sales comparison and income indications be weighed?
Next Question
A sales-comparison indication depends heavily on one sale. What should the appraiser review during reconciliation?