EstatePass
income-approachmedium

An appraiser is analyzing a triple net (NNN) lease where the tenant is obligated to pay all property taxes, insurance, and maintenance — but the lease agreement explicitly excludes roof replacement from the tenant’s responsibilities, assigning that cost to the landlord. During the assignment, the appraiser learns the roof has 3 years of remaining economic life and will cost $420,000 to replace. How should this obligation affect the valuation of the leased fee interest?

Correct Answer

B) It should reduce the leased fee value by the present value of $420,000 discounted over 3 years at the appropriate yield rate.

Under USPAP Standards Rule 1-2 and the Income Approach, a landlord’s future capital obligations that are not borne by the tenant represent a diminution in the value of the leased fee interest. The present value of the expected roof replacement cost — a material, non-recurring capital outlay — must be deducted from the value indicated by capitalizing the contract rent stream. This is consistent with the ‘cost-to-cure’ concept in lease analysis and is required to reflect the net benefit to the fee owner. Option A is incorrect: capital expenditures affecting the asset’s longevity *are* relevant to value in long-term leases. Option C mischaracterizes the issue — the rent is not defective; the obligation is an unaccounted liability. Option D confuses control with economic burden.

Answer Options
A
It should be ignored because roof replacement is a capital expenditure, not an operating expense, and thus excluded from NOI.
B
It should reduce the leased fee value by the present value of $420,000 discounted over 3 years at the appropriate yield rate.
C
It should be treated as a lease defect requiring a downward adjustment to the contract rent before capitalization.
D
It should increase the leased fee value because the landlord retains control over timing and quality of the repair.

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Under USPAP Standards Rule 1-2 and the Income Approach, a landlord’s future capital obligations that are not borne by the tenant represent a diminution in the value of the leased fee interest. The present value of the expected roof replacement cost — a material, non-recurring capital outlay — must be deducted from the value indicated by capitalizing the contract rent stream. This is consistent with the ‘cost-to-cure’ concept in lease analysis and is required to reflect the net benefit to the fee owner. Option A is incorrect: capital expenditures affecting the asset’s longevity *are* relevant to value in long-term leases. Option C mischaracterizes the issue — the rent is not defective; the obligation is an unaccounted liability. Option D confuses control with economic burden.

Was this explanation helpful?

More income-approach Questions

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing