EstatePass
Income ApproachMEDIUM8.2% of exam

An appraiser derives an overall rate of 7.5% from four sales ranging from 6.9% to 8.2%. The conclusion should:

Correct Answer

D) Explain why the rate fits the subject

Explain why the chosen rate fits the subject’s income, risk, growth expectations and comparable evidence. Neither a midpoint nor the lowest observed rate is automatically correct. A supported statistical summary can inform the analysis but does not eliminate the need to assess comparability.

Answer Options
A
Average the four rates without comment
B
Use the midpoint of the observed range
C
Adopt the lowest rate to be conservative
D
Explain why the rate fits the subject

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Option D is correct because the appraiser should explain why the selected 7.5% rate fits the subject's income, risk, growth expectations and the comparable evidence. Rates extracted from comparable sales provide market support, but the selection still depends on comparability. Explaining the reasoning makes the conclusion credible.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: Average the four rates without comment

Option A says to average the four rates without comment. A simple average ignores differences in comparability, and leaving it unexplained provides no support for why it fits the subject.

Option B: Use the midpoint of the observed range

Option B says to use the midpoint of the observed range. The midpoint of 6.9% to 8.2% is not correct by default; the selected rate should reflect how the subject compares with each sale.

Option C: Adopt the lowest rate to be conservative

Option C says to adopt the lowest rate to be conservative. The lowest rate, 6.9%, would actually produce the highest value, and choosing it without regard to comparability is unsupported.

Select, then support

Pick the rate based on comparability, then explain why it fits the subject.

How to use: Use this whenever a question asks how to conclude a rate, adjustment or value from a range.

Exam Tip

Prefer answers that call for reasoned, explained judgment over mechanical shortcuts like averages, midpoints or extremes.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • -Averaging rates without considering comparability
  • -Thinking the lowest cap rate is conservative
  • -Reporting a rate with no explanation

Concept Deep Dive

Analysis

This question tests how an appraiser reconciles a range of market-derived capitalization rates. Selecting a rate requires judgment about how the subject's income, risk and growth compare with each comparable. The conclusion should be explained and supported, not produced mechanically.

Background Knowledge

Overall capitalization rates are commonly extracted from comparable sales, which provide market support for the subject's rate. The comparables will usually show a range, reflecting differences in risk, income quality and growth. The appraiser selects a rate within or near that range and explains the reasoning.

Real-World Application

An appraiser extracts overall rates from four apartment sales ranging from 6.9% to 8.2%. Because the subject has newer construction and a stronger tenant base than the high-rate sales, she selects 7.5% and explains in the report how each sale compares.

capitalization raterate selectioncomparable salesreconciliationmarket support
Was this explanation helpful?

More Income Approach Questions

Which model describes yield capitalization of property benefits?

An appraiser is valuing a duplex. A market survey of recent duplex sales reports prices at 10.8 times potential gross income, with stabilized vacancy and credit loss of 10% of PGI and no other income. The subject's rent schedule is unavailable, but the property manager's records show collected income of $54,000 a year, in line with market rent and the 10% market loss. What value is indicated?

The subject property is a fourplex with annual EGI of $72,000 and operating expenses of $28,800. Of those expenses, $18,000 is fixed and $10,800 varies in direct proportion to EGI. The owner's annual mortgage payments are $21,000. An appraiser projects that EGI will fall 10% because of higher vacancy. What is the projected NOI?

Annual NOI available for debt service is $168,000 and total annual mortgage principal and interest debt service is $120,000. What is NOI ÷ debt service?

Annual PGI is $250,000 and combined vacancy and collection loss is explicitly 12% of that same PGI base. There is no other income. What annual EGI remains?

Annual PGI is $360,000 and combined vacancy and collection loss is explicitly 8% of that same PGI base. There is no other income. What annual EGI remains?

Annual PGI is $640,000. Combined vacancy and collection loss is 6.25% of PGI. There is no other income. What EGI remains?

An appraiser is updating a prior appraisal of a triplex with potential gross income of $60,000 and no other income. The prior appraisal used vacancy and credit loss of 5% of PGI, and a new survey of competing rentals indicates 8%. The operating expenses of $24,000 are property taxes, insurance and contract services that do not vary with occupancy, and the market overall rate remains 7.5%. By what percentages do effective gross income and indicated value decrease?

Annual potential rental income is $600,000 and vacancy loss alone is $36,000. What percentage of potential rent does that loss represent?

In the subject's market, lenders on fourplexes have lowered their typical loan-to-value ratio from 70% to 60%. The annual mortgage constant remains 5% and the equity dividend rate remains 10%. The subject's NOI has not changed. How does this affect the overall rate indicated by the band of investment and the indicated value?

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing