Agricultural land is being appraised where development pressure has begun to appear. What determines its value?
Correct Answer
D) The reasonably probable use meeting all four highest-and-best-use tests
Land is valued using the reasonably probable use that is legally permissible, physically possible, financially feasible and maximally productive as of the effective date. Development pressure is evidence to investigate, not permission to assume rezoning or ignore conversion costs.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option D is correct because land is valued at its highest and best use, which must be reasonably probable and must be legally permissible, physically possible, financially feasible and maximally productive. Development pressure is evidence to investigate, such as zoning, demand and conversion costs, rather than a reason to assume rezoning or ignore costs.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Agricultural use, without considering the legal development potential of the land
Option A says to value the land at agricultural use without considering legal development potential. Ignoring legally permissible development options skips the highest and best use analysis, which could undervalue land whose probable use is changing.
Option B: Development use whenever it has the highest gross receipts
Option B picks development use whenever it has the highest gross receipts. Gross receipts ignore costs and risk; the use must be financially feasible and maximally productive in terms of value, not merely produce the largest gross income.
Option C: The use the owner proposes, whether or not it is feasible
Option C uses whatever the owner proposes, whether or not it is feasible. Highest and best use is based on what is reasonably probable in the market, so an infeasible owner plan does not determine value.
Legal, Physical, Financial, Maximal
Run the four tests in order: legally permissible, physically possible, financially feasible, maximally productive. A use must pass all four and be reasonably probable.
How to use: Use this sequence whenever a question asks what use determines value.
Exam Tip
Prefer the answer that requires a reasonably probable use meeting all four tests over answers based on current use alone, gross income, or owner wishes.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Valuing land only at its current use when a change is reasonably probable
- -Assuming rezoning will be granted because neighbors are developing
- -Choosing the use with the largest gross income rather than the highest supported value
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests highest and best use for land in transition. When development pressure appears, the appraiser does not simply keep the current use or jump to the most profitable-looking use. The land is valued at the reasonably probable use that passes all four tests as of the effective date.
Background Knowledge
Highest and best use is the reasonably probable use that is legally permissible, physically possible, financially feasible and maximally productive. For land in transition, the appraiser weighs whether a change of use is likely as of the effective date, considering zoning, demand, timing and costs of conversion.
Real-World Application
An appraiser values a farm at the edge of a growing town where new subdivisions are approaching. She researches zoning, the likelihood of rezoning, utility extension, absorption and development costs before concluding whether continued agricultural use or a future development use is the reasonably probable highest and best use.
More Land/Site Questions
How should an appraiser account for a site's access to public sewer compared with competing sites that require septic systems?
Which fact, if supported by competitive-market evidence, most directly supports a unit-price premium for an otherwise comparable site?
A rectangular site's frontage is doubled while its depth is halved, keeping area constant. What is the likely value effect in a retail district?
A downtown site's zoning height limit is reduced from six stories to three. Buyers in this market had been paying for six-story development potential. What effect on land value is most supportable?
A zoning change increases permitted density from four to eight units per acre. What is the likely effect on site value?
Using the allocation method, market evidence supports a typical land-to-total-property-value ratio of 28% for similar improved properties in the subject’s location. An improved comparable sold for $825,000. What land (site) contribution is indicated by applying that ratio?
An appraiser is valuing a vacant site near a landfill. A similar vacant site that is not affected by the landfill sold for $480,000. Paired land sales indicate that proximity to the landfill lowers site prices by $70,000. No other adjustments apply. What is the indicated value of the subject site?
An appraiser is extracting site value from a $600,000 cash sale. The seller's records show an original construction cost of $250,000 and a depreciated book value of $110,000. The appraiser estimates current replacement cost new at $400,000 and accrued depreciation from all causes at $100,000. What is the indicated site value?
Three parcels assembled under single ownership (standard appraisal guidance assemblage) support separate as-is values of $290,000, $340,000, and $250,000. After assemblage for a higher-utility use, the combined site is valued at $1,050,000. Assemblage costs (demolition, legal, holding, and related) total $55,000. What is the indicated net plottage (plottage increment after assemblage costs)?
A comparable commercial site with 65 front feet sold for a cash-equivalent price of $585,000. Per standard appraisal guidance, sale price per front foot is a vacant-land unit of comparison when frontage is a primary value determinant. The subject site has 72 front feet and is otherwise similar. What indicated land value does the front-foot unit support before other adjustments?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
The subject is a vacant site with an irregular shape. A comparable vacant site with a regular shape sold for $395,000. Paired land sales indicate a discount of $57,000 for an irregular shape. No other adjustments apply. What is the indicated land value of the subject?
Next Question
How does site value enter the cost approach?