A value opinion for a subdivision as if fully built out two years from now is what kind of assignment, and what does it require?
Correct Answer
B) A prospective appraisal, with the future effective date clearly disclosed
Why this is correct: A prospective appraisal estimates value as of a future effective date, such as after build-out, and must clearly disclose that future date and support the forecast, per the original explanation. Why the other choices are wrong: "Prohibited speculation that the standards do not allow in any assignment" is incorrect; prospective appraisals are permitted under USPAP. "A standard current appraisal with rounding" is wrong; a future date is not rounding. "A feasibility study exempt from USPAP" is false; an appraisal with a value conclusion is subject to USPAP. Exam tip: Prospective means looking forward; disclose the future date prominently.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
A value opinion with a future effective date is a prospective appraisal, which is permitted provided the prospective effective date is clearly disclosed and the underlying forecasts are reasonable and supported.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Prohibited speculation that the standards do not allow in any assignment
Prospective appraisals are expressly recognised and routinely required for construction lending and development work.
Option C: A standard current appraisal with rounding
A prospective value is not a current appraisal. The effective date differs, and the analysis rests on forecasts rather than current conditions.
Option D: A feasibility study exempt from USPAP
A prospective appraisal is an appraisal and is fully subject to USPAP. Feasibility elements do not exempt it.
Three Effective Dates
Three Effective Dates: past, present and future. The future one is prospective and it must be labelled.
How to use: State both dates — the report date and the effective date — so the reader sees the gap between them.
Exam Tip
The forecasts are where credibility lives. Absorption and pricing projections must be supported by market evidence, not assumed.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Treating prospective appraisals as impermissible
- -Confusing the effective date with the report date
- -Forecasting absorption without market support
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
USPAP recognises three effective date categories: current, retrospective and prospective. A value opinion for a subdivision as if fully built out two years hence is prospective — the effective date lies in the future — and such assignments are entirely proper and routinely required for construction lending, feasibility work and development planning. The requirements attaching to them are specific. The prospective effective date must be clearly disclosed, along with the date of the report, so a reader can see the relationship between them. The analysis rests on forecasts of absorption, pricing and cost that must be reasonable and supported by market evidence rather than assumed, and the assumptions underlying the forecast should be stated. Distinguishing the effective date from the report date is essential: the report is prepared today using data available today, while the value opinion speaks to conditions projected for a future moment. None of that makes the assignment speculative in the prohibited sense, exempt from USPAP, or reducible to a current appraisal.
Background Knowledge
USPAP recognises current, retrospective and prospective effective dates. Prospective appraisals require clear disclosure of the future effective date and reasonable, supported forecasts of absorption, pricing and cost.
Real-World Application
An appraiser produces a prospective value at completion for a subdivision, discloses the future effective date prominently, and documents the absorption forecast's support.
More USPAP Questions
Which type of appraisal report may contain the appraiser's analyses, opinions, and conclusions but is intended for use by the client only?
How long must an appraiser retain the workfile for an appraisal assignment under USPAP?
If an appraiser uses a hypothetical condition that the subject property is 10% larger than it actually is, this must be:
Under Standard 1, when developing a real property appraisal, an appraiser must:
An appraiser accepts an assignment to appraise a specialized industrial property but has never appraised this property type before. To comply with the Competency Rule, the appraiser:
According to the Scope of Work Rule, the scope of work must be appropriate to the:
According to Standard 1, when developing an opinion of market value, an appraiser must analyze:
A lender emails: 'We need at least $450,000 to make this loan work — can you take the assignment?' Accepting on that basis is:
An appraiser is developing an opinion of market value for a 20-unit apartment building. The appraiser finds three comparable sales with the following information: Sale 1: 18 units, sold for $1,800,000; Sale 2: 22 units, sold for $2,200,000; Sale 3: 24 units, sold for $2,280,000. What is the average price per unit for these comparables?
In developing a scope of work, an appraiser must consider all of the following factors EXCEPT:
People Also Study
Valuation Principles & Procedures
25% of exam
Property Description & Analysis
20% of exam
Market Analysis & Highest/Best Use
15% of exam
Appraisal Math & Statistics
15% of exam
Report Writing & Compliance
10% of exam
Related Tools
Previous Question
A client engages an appraiser to evaluate the quality of another appraiser's report. Standard 3 governs:
Next Question
An appraiser discovers that a comparable sale used in the analysis was actually a foreclosure sale, but this information was not initially available. Under USPAP, the appraiser should: