An appraiser discovers that a comparable sale used in the analysis was actually a foreclosure sale, but this information was not initially available. Under USPAP, the appraiser should:
Correct Answer
A) Remove the sale and reconsider the analysis if it affects credibility
Why this is correct: USPAP's Standards Rule 1-5 requires an appraiser to consider any new information that may affect credibility. The original explanation states the appraiser must reconsider the analysis. The governing concept is that a foreclosure sale is typically a non-arm's length transaction and may not reflect market value, potentially compromising the appraisal's credibility. Therefore, the appraiser must remove the sale and reconsider the analysis if its use affects credibility. Why the other choices are wrong: 'Keep the sale but note it in the workfile only' is wrong because merely noting a problem in the workfile does not fulfill the duty to reconsider the analysis and conclusions. 'Use the sale but apply a standard foreclosure adjustment' is wrong because there is no USPAP-endorsed 'standard' adjustment for this; the sale's fundamental reliability is in question. 'Continue using the sale since it was reasonable at the time' is wrong because USPAP requires action upon discovery of new, relevant information, regardless of initial reasonableness. Exam tip: Remember USPAP's focus on credibility. New information that could affect it triggers a mandatory reconsideration, not just a note or an automatic adjustment.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option B correctly reflects USPAP's requirement that appraisers must reconsider their analysis when discovering information that could affect credibility. Foreclosure sales often involve distressed circumstances that may not represent typical market conditions, potentially compromising their reliability as market indicators. The appraiser has a professional duty to reassess whether this sale should continue to be used in the analysis. If the foreclosure status materially affects the sale's credibility as a market indicator, the ethical response is to remove it and reconsider the overall analysis.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
CREDIBLE Analysis Rule
C-R-E-D-I-B-L-E: 'Credibility Requires Eliminating Doubtful Information Before Logical Evaluation' - When you discover information that makes a comparable sale doubtful (like foreclosure status), you must eliminate or reconsider it to maintain credible analysis.
How to use: When you see questions about discovering new information about comparables, think 'CREDIBLE' and remember that maintaining credibility requires removing or reconsidering doubtful sales rather than just noting them or applying standard adjustments.
Exam Tip
Look for keywords like 'discovers,' 'credibility,' and 'foreclosure' - these signal USPAP credibility requirements. The correct answer will typically involve reassessing or removing questionable data rather than simply noting it or applying generic adjustments.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Thinking that reasonable initial research protects against later discoveries
- -Believing that simply noting problematic information in the workfile is sufficient
- -Assuming there are standard adjustments that can fix any comparable sale issue
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests understanding of USPAP's requirement for ongoing analysis credibility and the appraiser's duty to reconsider conclusions when new material information becomes available. USPAP emphasizes that appraisers must maintain the credibility of their analysis throughout the assignment, which includes addressing information discovered after initial research that could materially affect the valuation. Foreclosure sales often involve distressed circumstances that may not reflect typical market conditions, potentially making them unreliable indicators of market value. The key principle is that professional responsibility requires reassessing and potentially revising analysis when credibility-affecting information emerges.
Background Knowledge
USPAP requires appraisers to develop credible assignment results and to reconsider their analysis when new information becomes available that could affect the reliability of their conclusions. Foreclosure sales often involve distressed circumstances, time pressures, or below-market pricing that may not reflect typical buyer-seller motivations required for market value estimates.
Real-World Application
In practice, appraisers often discover additional information about sales after initial research through MLS updates, broker conversations, or public records. When learning a sale was a foreclosure, short sale, or involved other distressed circumstances, the appraiser must evaluate whether it still represents typical market conditions and either remove it or clearly justify its continued use with appropriate analysis.
More USPAP Questions
Which statement best defines a hypothetical condition under USPAP?
According to the Competency Rule, if an appraiser lacks the knowledge and experience to complete an assignment competently, which action is NOT acceptable?
An appraiser runs only the sales comparison approach on a standard tract home and omits the cost and income approaches. Under Standard 1 this is:
A value opinion for a subdivision as if fully built out two years from now is what kind of assignment, and what does it require?
A hypothetical condition differs from an extraordinary assumption in that a hypothetical condition:
An appraiser must disclose in the certification whether they have:
A client-imposed requirement — 'use only comps from our approved list' — is best described as:
Under Standard 1, when developing a real property appraisal, an appraiser must:
The certification required by Standards Rule 2-3 must be signed by:
According to Standard 1, when developing an opinion of market value, an appraiser must analyze:
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam