EstatePass
USPAPMEDIUM18.2% of exam

A client-imposed requirement — 'use only comps from our approved list' — is best described as:

Correct Answer

C) An assignment condition to be tested against the credibility floor before acceptance

A client’s comparable-list restriction is an assignment condition to evaluate against the necessary scope. If it prevents credible results, modify the condition or decline/withdraw. It is not a legal jurisdictional exception and does not become acceptable merely through disclosure.

Answer Options
A
A perfectly normal engagement term that the appraiser simply follows as written
B
A jurisdictional exception to the standards
C
An assignment condition to be tested against the credibility floor before acceptance
D
A hypothetical condition requiring disclosure

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Option C is correct because a client's approved-list comparable restriction is an assignment condition, and USPAP says an appraiser must not allow assignment conditions to limit the scope so much that results are not credible in the context of the intended use. The appraiser tests the restriction against that credibility standard before accepting. If it would prevent credible results, the appraiser seeks modification or declines or withdraws.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: A perfectly normal engagement term that the appraiser simply follows as written

Option A is wrong because treating it as a perfectly normal engagement term that the appraiser simply follows as written skips the required credibility evaluation. Following it blindly could produce non-credible results.

Option B: A jurisdictional exception to the standards

Option B is wrong because a jurisdictional exception arises only when law or regulation precludes compliance with part of USPAP. A client's comparable list is not a law or regulation.

Option D: A hypothetical condition requiring disclosure

Option D is wrong because a hypothetical condition is a premise contrary to known facts used for analysis. A restriction on data sources is an assignment condition, and disclosing it does not by itself make it acceptable.

Conditions cannot cut credibility

Clients may set conditions, but no condition may cut the scope below what credible results require.

How to use: Use this when a client restriction on data or methods appears in a question.

Exam Tip

When a client restricts data or methods, look for an answer that weighs the restriction against credibility rather than one that simply complies or simply discloses.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • -Following client restrictions without checking credibility
  • -Calling a client requirement a jurisdictional exception
  • -Believing disclosure alone cures a scope-limiting condition

Concept Deep Dive

Analysis

This question tests assignment conditions under the Scope of Work Rule. A client's restriction on which comparables may be used limits the scope of work. The appraiser must decide whether the restriction still allows credible results for the intended use.

Background Knowledge

Assignment conditions include assumptions, conditions, laws, regulations and other restrictions that affect scope of work. Client restrictions on data, inspection or methods are common. The appraiser remains responsible for ensuring the scope still produces credible results.

Real-World Application

A lender's portal requires comparables from an approved list that contains no sales from the subject's rural market. The appraiser explains that credible results need local sales and asks the lender to remove the restriction, ready to decline if it will not.

assignment conditionsScope of Work Rulecredible resultsclient restrictionscomparable selection
Was this explanation helpful?

More USPAP Questions

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing