EstatePass
USPAPmedium18.2% of exam

A client engages an appraiser to evaluate the quality of another appraiser's report. Standard 3 governs:

Correct Answer

B) The development of an appraisal review

Why this is correct: Standard 3 governs the development of an appraisal review, which is the act or process of developing an opinion about the quality of another appraiser's work. The review itself must be developed competently and credibly. Why the other choices are wrong: 'The reporting of a mass appraisal' is wrong because that is governed by Standard 6. 'The valuation of personal property and related assets' is wrong because that is governed by Standards 7 and 8. 'The retention period for workfiles' is wrong because that is governed by the Record Keeping Rule, not a Standard. Exam tip: Standard 3 = Development of a review. Standard 4 = Reporting of a review.

Answer Options
A
The reporting of a mass appraisal
B
The development of an appraisal review
C
The valuation of personal property and related assets
D
The retention period for workfiles

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Evaluating the quality of another appraiser's report is the definition of an appraisal review, and the development of a review is governed by Standard 3. That standard requires the reviewer to identify the client and intended users, the intended use, the purpose, the work under review and its effective date, and the scope of work, and then to develop an opinion about the completeness, accuracy, adequacy, relevance, and reasonableness of the work reviewed. If the reviewer also develops his own opinion of value, additional development requirements attach. Communicating that review opinion then falls under Standard 4.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A: The reporting of a mass appraisal

Mass appraisal reporting sits in Standard 6, with mass appraisal development in Standard 5. Mass appraisal is the valuation of a universe of properties using common data and statistical testing, typically for ad valorem taxation, which is a different activity from judging one appraiser's work. The option is a plausible distractor only because both involve a numbered standard the average candidate rarely reads.

Option C: The valuation of personal property and related assets

Personal property appraisal development and reporting are Standards 7 and 8. Personal property means identifiable tangible objects other than real estate, such as machinery, art, and equipment, and the standards address different competency and market issues. Nothing about reviewing another appraiser's real property report touches that pair.

Option D: The retention period for workfiles

Workfile content and retention are governed by the Record Keeping Rule, not by any Standard, and the retention period is at least five years after preparation or at least two years after final disposition of any judicial proceeding in which the appraiser testified, whichever is longer. Rules apply across all assignment types, which is precisely why record keeping lives outside the numbered Standards. Mixing up Rules and Standards is the underlying error here.

Odd Develops, Even Reports

Count the pairs: 1 and 2 real property, 3 and 4 review, 5 and 6 mass appraisal, 7 and 8 personal property, 9 and 10 business. The odd number always develops and the even number always reports. Five pairs, one pattern.

How to use: Identify the activity in the stem, find its pair, then decide whether the stem describes doing the work or writing it up. Develop, analyze, and form an opinion point to the odd standard; report, communicate, and disclose point to the even one.

Exam Tip

Anything about workfiles, competency, confidentiality, or scope decisions comes from a Rule, not a Standard. If an option names a Standard for one of those topics, eliminate it immediately.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • -Assuming a reviewer automatically develops his own opinion of value
  • -Attributing workfile retention to a Standard rather than the Record Keeping Rule
  • -Mixing up the review pair with the mass appraisal pair because both are less familiar than Standards 1 and 2

Concept Deep Dive

Analysis

USPAP is organized in pairs: a development standard followed by a reporting standard for each kind of assignment. Standard 1 covers development of a real property appraisal and Standard 2 its reporting. Standard 3 covers development of an appraisal review and Standard 4 its reporting. Standard 5 and Standard 6 handle mass appraisal development and reporting, Standards 7 and 8 handle personal property, and Standards 9 and 10 handle business appraisal and intangible assets. An appraisal review is defined as the act or process of developing and communicating an opinion about the quality of another appraiser's work, which is exactly what the client in this stem is asking for. Recognizing the pairing structure lets you answer nearly any which-standard question without memorizing text.

Background Knowledge

You need the layout of USPAP: the Definitions, the Rules including Ethics, Record Keeping, Competency, Scope of Work, and Jurisdictional Exception, then the Standards in development and reporting pairs. You also need the definition of appraisal review and the distinction between reviewing work and appraising property.

Real-World Application

A bank's chief appraiser assigns a review of a $4 million retail appraisal. The reviewer identifies his client and intended use, states the scope of his review, evaluates whether the sales selection and cap rate support hold up, and issues a review report that says whether the work is credible without silently substituting his own value unless the assignment calls for one.

Standard 3appraisal reviewdevelopment versus reportingRecord Keeping Rule
Was this explanation helpful?

More USPAP Questions

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing