A site is a former gasoline station with known soil contamination. How should the appraiser proceed?
Correct Answer
D) Identify the issue and address it in the analysis
Why this is correct: Appraisers must identify known environmental conditions (like contamination) that could affect value, disclose them in the report, and address their impact in the valuation analysis. This typically involves relying on an environmental expert's report for cost estimates and reflecting market reaction (stigma) to the condition. Why the other choices are wrong: 'Assume remediation is complete without disclosure' is wrong; that would be misleading. 'Value it as though the contamination never existed' is wrong; that ignores a material fact. 'Decline, since contaminated sites cannot be appraised' is wrong; they can be appraised with proper analysis and disclosure. Exam tip: Known environmental issues must be disclosed and their impact analyzed. You rely on experts for specifics but must reflect the market's view.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
The appraiser must identify the known contamination and address it in the analysis, disclosing it and relying on qualified expertise or a properly disclosed extraordinary assumption.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Assume remediation is complete without disclosure
Assuming remediation is complete without disclosure conceals a material condition and makes the report misleading.
Option B: Value it as though the contamination never existed
Valuing as though contamination never existed is a hypothetical condition, permissible only if disclosed and appropriate to the intended use.
Option C: Decline, since contaminated sites cannot be appraised
Contaminated sites are routinely appraised. The competency issue is addressed by disclosure and expertise, not by refusal.
Disclose, Then Get Help
Disclose, Then Get Help. You must address what you know; you need not be the expert who measures it.
How to use: Separate the two questions: what must be disclosed, and who is competent to quantify it.
Exam Tip
An extraordinary assumption about remediation cost is often the practical answer, but only if reasonable and prominently disclosed.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Assuming remediation without disclosure
- -Applying a hypothetical condition silently
- -Declining rather than addressing the competency question
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
Known contamination is a fact about the property, and an appraiser who is aware of it must address it — the assignment does not become impossible, and it does not become permissible to pretend the condition away. What the appraiser typically cannot do is quantify the remediation cost, which requires environmental expertise outside appraisal competency. The usual course is to identify the condition, disclose it, and either engage or rely on a qualified environmental professional's estimate, or state an extraordinary assumption about remediation cost or status, prominently disclosed, if the client's intended use permits. Where an extraordinary assumption is used it must be reasonable, identified as such, and its potential effect on the conclusion made clear. The distractors describe three ways of going wrong: assuming remediation is complete without saying so is undisclosed and misleading; valuing as though contamination never existed is a hypothetical condition requiring disclosure; and declining outright treats a manageable competency issue as an absolute bar.
Background Knowledge
USPAP requires appraisers to analyse known conditions affecting value and to operate within their competency. Environmental contamination is addressed through disclosure, qualified expertise, or a properly disclosed extraordinary assumption or hypothetical condition.
Real-World Application
An appraiser valuing a former service station discloses the known contamination, relies on an environmental consultant's remediation estimate, and reports the basis clearly.
More Land/Site Questions
Under which condition is the land residual technique most applicable?
Why can the same physical parcel carry different values in two assignments?
In a built-up area where no vacant land has sold for years, which approach to site value is the usual fallback?
How is entrepreneurial profit treated in the subdivision development method?
A land comparable sold 18 months ago in a market rising about 4 percent a year. What adjustment direction applies?
Why does a developer's required profit rise for a longer subdivision project?
How does holding cost enter the valuation of land bought for future development?
Excess land is best described as land that has which characteristic?
Plottage value arises in which of the following situations?
Which of the following is an off-site improvement rather than a site improvement?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam