A sale where the buyer paid cash in an all-cash market requires:
Correct Answer
B) No cash equivalency adjustment
Why this is correct: The core principle is that adjustments are made only when a comparable sale's terms differ from the prevailing market conditions. The original explanation states that cash equivalency corrects for financing that differs from market norms. Here, the market itself is described as 'all-cash,' meaning cash payment is the norm. Therefore, a cash sale is already at market terms and requires no adjustment. Why the other choices are wrong: An upward adjustment for the lack of financing is incorrect because in an all-cash market, there is no 'lack' of financing; cash is the standard. A downward adjustment for a cash discount is wrong because a discount implies a concession, but in this market, paying cash is the expected, not a concession. Exclusion from the comparable set is unnecessary; a cash sale in a cash market is a perfectly valid comparable. Exam tip: For financing adjustments, always identify the market norm first. If the sale terms match the norm, no adjustment is needed.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Why this is correct: The core principle is that adjustments are made only when a comparable sale's terms differ from the prevailing market conditions. The original explanation states that cash equivalency corrects for financing that differs from market norms. Here, the market itself is described as 'all-cash,' meaning cash payment is the norm. Therefore, a cash sale is already at market terms and requires no adjustment. Why the other choices are wrong: An upward adjustment for the lack of financing is incorrect because in an all-cash market, there is no 'lack' of financing; cash is the standard. A downward adjustment for a cash discount is wrong because a discount implies a concession, but in this market, paying cash is the expected, not a concession. Exclusion from the comparable set is unnecessary; a cash sale in a cash market is a perfectly valid comparable. Exam tip: For financing adjustments, always identify the market norm first. If the sale terms match the norm, no adjustment is needed.
More sales-comparison-approach Questions
Excess land differs from surplus land in that excess land:
A subject property has a 3-car attached garage. The appraiser locates two valid paired sales: Sale 1 (with 3-car garage) sold for $512,000; Sale 2 (with 2-car garage) sold for $497,600. Both properties are otherwise identical β same age, quality, GLA, lot size, and neighborhood β and sold 5 days apart in a balanced market. The appraiser also confirms via public records and listing photos that no other functional or physical differences exist. What is the indicated contributory value of the *third* garage stall?
The most appropriate unit of comparison is determined by:
An appraiser analyzes three paired sales to isolate the effect of a fireplace. In Pair 1, the property with a fireplace sold for $12,000 more; in Pair 2, $10,500 more; and in Pair 3, $13,500 more. All pairs are highly similar and recent. The appraiser selects $12,000 as the final adjustment. Which principle best supports this selection?
A paired sales analysis yields an adjustment of β$15,000 for a property located on a busy arterial street. Later, the appraiser discovers that all three paired properties with arterial exposure also had 20% smaller lots than their non-arterial counterparts β a difference not initially controlled for. What is the most appropriate action per USPAP?
An appraiser identifies two comparable sales that are identical in all respects except that Sale #1 has a finished basement (1,200 sq ft) and sold for $432,000, while Sale #2 has an unfinished basement of the same size and sold for $408,000. Both sales occurred within three weeks of each other in a stable market. The appraiser intends to apply a per-square-foot adjustment for basement finish to the subject property, which has a 1,000 sq ft finished basement. What is the appropriate paired-sales-derived adjustment amount per square foot for a finished basement?
Three sales support $520,000; the borrower's purchase contract is $505,000. May the appraisal conclude above the contract price?
An appraiser develops a $3,200 adjustment for a fireplace based on a single paired sale. The subject has a fireplace; Comparable A does not. The appraiser applies +$3,200 to Comparable A. Later, the appraiser identifies a second pair showing a $4,600 fireplace contribution. The appraiser replaces the original adjustment with $3,900 β the simple average β and applies it to Comparable A. What is the appropriate USPAP-compliant action regarding the adjustment amount?
A comparable sold for $300,000 with the seller carrying a loan 2 points below market, a benefit worth $8,000. What is its cash-equivalent price?
Three comparables adjust to $412,000 (gross adj. 5%), $405,000 (gross adj. 22%), and $410,000 (gross adj. 8%). What is the best-supported value conclusion?
People Also Study
Valuation Principles & Procedures
25% of exam
Property Description & Analysis
20% of exam
Market Analysis & Highest/Best Use
15% of exam
Appraisal Math & Statistics
15% of exam
USPAP (Ethics & Standards)
15% of exam
Previous Question
Two sales differ by a finished basement and by six months of market movement. To isolate the basement's value the appraiser must:
Next Question
The subject has a three-car garage; the comparable has two. If the market pays $9,000 for the third bay, the adjustment to the comparable is:
