A parcel is held vacant awaiting a planned highway interchange. How is this best described?
Correct Answer
D) A speculative holding for future demand
Holding pending anticipated demand is a speculative investment strategy. It is not automatically the parcel’s highest and best use. Any market-value reliance on the interchange and future development must account for reasonable probability, timing, approvals, costs and risk.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option D is correct because holding land vacant in anticipation of future demand from a planned interchange is a speculative investment strategy. Such holding can sometimes be the highest and best use, but it is not automatically so. Any market-value reliance on the future interchange must account for probability, timing, approvals, costs and risk.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Excess land held apart from a main site
Option A, excess land held apart from a main site, describes additional land beyond what a primary improved site needs that could be separately used or sold. The parcel here is a standalone holding awaiting future demand, not extra land attached to a main site.
Option B: A legally nonconforming vacant parcel
Option B, a legally nonconforming vacant parcel, refers to a lot that does not meet current zoning standards. Nothing in the facts suggests a zoning nonconformity; the parcel is simply held for future demand.
Option C: Surplus land with no independent use
Option C, surplus land with no independent use, describes extra land on an improved site that cannot be separately used or sold. The facts describe a parcel held for future development, not inseparable extra land.
Waiting land is speculative land
Land held vacant while waiting for future demand is a speculative holding.
How to use: Use this phrase when a question describes land held for anticipated growth or infrastructure.
Exam Tip
Match the term to the facts: excess and surplus land relate to extra area on an improved site, while speculative holdings relate to waiting for future demand.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Confusing excess land with surplus land
- -Assuming speculative holding is automatically the highest and best use
- -Valuing land as if a planned project were already certain
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests terminology for land held for anticipated future demand. A parcel kept vacant while awaiting a planned highway interchange is a speculative holding. Candidates must distinguish this from excess land, surplus land and legally nonconforming parcels, which describe different situations.
Background Knowledge
Land in transition may be held for future development, sometimes with an interim use before it reaches its future highest and best use. In a depressed market, holding land for future development can be the highest and best use. Excess land can be separately used or sold, whereas surplus land cannot be separated from the site.
Real-World Application
An investor buys farmland near a proposed interchange and leaves it vacant. The appraiser considers the probability and timing of the interchange, required approvals and risk before giving any weight to future development potential.
More Land/Site Questions
How should an appraiser account for a site's access to public sewer compared with competing sites that require septic systems?
Which fact, if supported by competitive-market evidence, most directly supports a unit-price premium for an otherwise comparable site?
A rectangular site's frontage is doubled while its depth is halved, keeping area constant. What is the likely value effect in a retail district?
A downtown site's zoning height limit is reduced from six stories to three. Buyers in this market had been paying for six-story development potential. What effect on land value is most supportable?
A zoning change increases permitted density from four to eight units per acre. What is the likely effect on site value?
Using the allocation method, market evidence supports a typical land-to-total-property-value ratio of 28% for similar improved properties in the subject’s location. An improved comparable sold for $825,000. What land (site) contribution is indicated by applying that ratio?
An appraiser is valuing a vacant site near a landfill. A similar vacant site that is not affected by the landfill sold for $480,000. Paired land sales indicate that proximity to the landfill lowers site prices by $70,000. No other adjustments apply. What is the indicated value of the subject site?
An appraiser is extracting site value from a $600,000 cash sale. The seller's records show an original construction cost of $250,000 and a depreciated book value of $110,000. The appraiser estimates current replacement cost new at $400,000 and accrued depreciation from all causes at $100,000. What is the indicated site value?
Three parcels assembled under single ownership (standard appraisal guidance assemblage) support separate as-is values of $290,000, $340,000, and $250,000. After assemblage for a higher-utility use, the combined site is valued at $1,050,000. Assemblage costs (demolition, legal, holding, and related) total $55,000. What is the indicated net plottage (plottage increment after assemblage costs)?
A comparable commercial site with 65 front feet sold for a cash-equivalent price of $585,000. Per standard appraisal guidance, sale price per front foot is a vacant-land unit of comparison when frontage is a primary value determinant. The subject site has 72 front feet and is otherwise similar. What indicated land value does the front-foot unit support before other adjustments?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam