A homesite includes an extra narrow buffer strip not needed to support the primary use. Reliable analysis finds no feasible independent use or separate sale, but the strip may contribute privacy to the homesite. How is it best characterized?
Correct Answer
C) Surplus land with contribution analyzed as part of the whole
Under the stated facts, the unnecessary inseparable strip is surplus land. Analyze whatever privacy or buffer contribution buyers recognize as part of the whole site; that contribution is not automatically positive or equal to an independent buildable lot value.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Option C is correct because land that does not support the existing improvement but cannot be sold separately or support an independent use is defined as surplus land. Because it has no independent use, its value is not estimated as a stand-alone parcel. Any privacy or buffer contribution that buyers recognize is analyzed as part of the whole site, and that contribution is not automatically positive or equal to a buildable lot value.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Excess land with its own independent use and separate market value
Option A describes the strip as excess land with its own independent use and separate market value. The facts state that reliable analysis found no feasible independent use or separate sale, which is exactly what rules out excess land.
Option B: An off-site physical improvement
Option B calls the strip an off-site physical improvement. The strip is part of the site itself and is land, not a constructed improvement located off the site.
Option D: A separately marketable building lot
Option D treats the strip as a separately marketable building lot. The analysis found no feasible separate sale, so the strip cannot be valued as an independent buildable lot.
Excess sells, surplus stays
Excess land can be sold or used on its own; surplus land stays attached to the main site. If it cannot leave the site, it is surplus.
How to use: Use this when a question asks whether extra land can be valued separately or only as part of the whole.
Exam Tip
Look for the words independent use or separate sale in the facts. If those are absent or ruled out, the extra land is surplus, not excess.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Valuing a non-separable strip at a full buildable lot price
- -Using the terms excess land and surplus land interchangeably
- -Assuming surplus land always adds positive value
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This question tests the difference between excess land and surplus land. The key facts are that the strip is not needed for the primary use, cannot be used independently, and cannot be sold separately. Land with those characteristics is surplus land, and any contribution it makes, such as privacy, is analyzed as part of the whole site.
Background Knowledge
Excess land is extra land that is not needed for the current use and has its own highest and best use, so it can be valued separately. Surplus land is extra land that is not needed for the current use but cannot be separately used or sold. Surplus land may still add some value to the whole property, and that contribution is measured from market evidence.
Real-World Application
An appraiser values a home on a lot with a narrow wooded strip along the rear line that is too small and oddly shaped to build on or sell to a neighbor. The appraiser treats the strip as surplus land and looks at paired sales to see whether buyers pay anything extra for the added privacy.
More Land/Site Questions
How should an appraiser account for a site's access to public sewer compared with competing sites that require septic systems?
Which fact, if supported by competitive-market evidence, most directly supports a unit-price premium for an otherwise comparable site?
A rectangular site's frontage is doubled while its depth is halved, keeping area constant. What is the likely value effect in a retail district?
A downtown site's zoning height limit is reduced from six stories to three. Buyers in this market had been paying for six-story development potential. What effect on land value is most supportable?
A zoning change increases permitted density from four to eight units per acre. What is the likely effect on site value?
Using the allocation method, market evidence supports a typical land-to-total-property-value ratio of 28% for similar improved properties in the subject’s location. An improved comparable sold for $825,000. What land (site) contribution is indicated by applying that ratio?
An appraiser is valuing a vacant site near a landfill. A similar vacant site that is not affected by the landfill sold for $480,000. Paired land sales indicate that proximity to the landfill lowers site prices by $70,000. No other adjustments apply. What is the indicated value of the subject site?
An appraiser is extracting site value from a $600,000 cash sale. The seller's records show an original construction cost of $250,000 and a depreciated book value of $110,000. The appraiser estimates current replacement cost new at $400,000 and accrued depreciation from all causes at $100,000. What is the indicated site value?
Three parcels assembled under single ownership (standard appraisal guidance assemblage) support separate as-is values of $290,000, $340,000, and $250,000. After assemblage for a higher-utility use, the combined site is valued at $1,050,000. Assemblage costs (demolition, legal, holding, and related) total $55,000. What is the indicated net plottage (plottage increment after assemblage costs)?
A comparable commercial site with 65 front feet sold for a cash-equivalent price of $585,000. Per standard appraisal guidance, sale price per front foot is a vacant-land unit of comparison when frontage is a primary value determinant. The subject site has 72 front feet and is otherwise similar. What indicated land value does the front-foot unit support before other adjustments?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Sales Comparison Approach
16.4% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam