A comparable's listing history shows three price reductions before it sold. That history is:
Correct Answer
C) Useful evidence about market conditions and pricing
Why this is correct: A property's listing history, including price reductions, provides direct evidence of market behavior. It helps the appraiser understand pricing trends, exposure time, and the negotiation process between initial listing and final sale. Why the other choices are wrong: Price reductions are not grounds for automatic exclusion if the sale is otherwise verified and arm's length. The history is relevant, not irrelevant, to market analysis. Reductions alone are not proof of undisclosed defects. Exam tip: Analyze listing history to support your opinions on market conditions and exposure time.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
Price reduction history is useful evidence about both market conditions and pricing behavior, which is why appraisers routinely pull days on market and list-to-sale ratios alongside the closed price. It supports the market conditions adjustment, informs the reasonable exposure time opinion, and helps distinguish a soft market from a mispriced listing. It also serves as a check on the sale itself, since a property that sold quickly at full list in a market of reductions may signal atypical motivation. Nothing about the history disqualifies the sale.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A: Grounds for excluding the sale from the adjustment grid
A price reduction is normal market behavior, not a defect in the transaction, and excluding every sale that had one would gut most comparable sets. Exclusion is warranted when a sale is not arm's length or its terms cannot be verified, neither of which follows from a seller lowering an asking price. Discarding the data also throws away the very evidence that would have supported a market conditions adjustment.
Option B: Irrelevant once the sale price is confirmed
Confirming the closed price answers only what the property sold for, not how the market behaved on the way there. Exposure time, list-to-sale ratio, and pricing trend are all separate conclusions the appraiser must reach, and the listing history is the primary evidence for them. Treating the final number as the only relevant fact discards most of what the transaction can teach.
Option D: Proof the property had undisclosed defects
Reductions have many ordinary explanations: an aggressive initial list price, a softening market, a seasonal slowdown, poor marketing, or a seller whose circumstances changed. Undisclosed defects are one possible explanation among many and cannot be inferred from price movement alone. Treating a reduction as proof of anything is a leap the evidence does not support, though it is a reasonable thing to ask about during verification.
The Whole Story, Not the Last Page
A closed price is the last page of a story that began with a list price. The reductions in between show how hard the market pushed back. Read the whole story and you learn about the market, not just about one house.
How to use: When a stem offers listing history, days on market, or list-to-sale data, choose the answer that treats it as evidence. Reject options that exclude the sale, dismiss the history, or leap to a conclusion about hidden defects.
Exam Tip
Do not confuse exposure time, which looks backward from the effective date, with marketing time, which looks forward from it. Listing history informs the first directly.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Using only closed sales and ignoring listing and pending data
- -Confusing exposure time with marketing time
- -Inferring a property defect from price reductions without verification
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
Listing history is market data in its own right, not background noise attached to a sale. A sequence of price reductions before a sale traces the distance between what a seller hoped for and what the market would actually pay, which is direct evidence of the relationship between asking prices and transaction prices in that market. It also measures exposure time, the length of time the property was on the market before the sale, which USPAP-defined market value opinions require the appraiser to consider and which is estimated for the subject as well. In a declining market a chain of reductions is corroboration of the direction and pace of the decline, useful for supporting a market conditions adjustment. In a stable market it more likely reflects an overpriced initial listing, which says something about that seller rather than about the market.
Background Knowledge
You need the definition of exposure time as the length of time the property would have been on the market prior to a hypothetical sale at the appraised value, and the requirement to develop an opinion of reasonable exposure time in market value assignments. You should also know how list-to-sale ratios and days on market are used to support market conditions adjustments.
Real-World Application
An appraiser sees three comparables that each took two reductions and over 120 days to sell, while a fourth sold in nine days at list. She uses the pattern to support a slightly negative market conditions adjustment and a 90 to 120 day exposure time, and verifies the fast sale for atypical motivation.
More Sales Comparison Questions
Excess land differs from surplus land in that excess land:
A paired sales analysis reveals that homes with stainless-steel appliances sell for $2,100 more than identical homes with standard appliances — but only when the homes are priced below $350,000. In the subject’s neighborhood, median sale price is $410,000. What is the appraiser’s obligation regarding the $2,100 appliance adjustment?
GLA differs by 210 sq ft between subject and comparable. Paired sales support $65 per sq ft of living area. The line adjustment is:
Paired sales are drawn from transactions six months apart in a stable market. The time adjustment needed is:
The most appropriate unit of comparison is determined by:
A comparable superior to the subject in every adjusted category should produce an indication that is:
Three sales support $520,000; the borrower's purchase contract is $505,000. May the appraisal conclude above the contract price?
A comparable sold for $300,000 with the seller carrying a loan 2 points below market, a benefit worth $8,000. What is its cash-equivalent price?
Why is a foreclosure sale generally a poor comparable in a stable market?
A comparable sold 8 months ago for $250,000 in a market appreciating 6% per year. What is the time-adjusted price?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam
Previous Question
An appraiser uses paired sales to estimate the adjustment for proximity to a public park. Four valid pairs yield adjustments of +$7,200, +$6,800, +$8,100, and +$7,900. The appraiser calculates the mean ($7,500) and notes the range is $1,300. Before applying the adjustment, the appraiser adjusts the $7,500 downward by 5% to reflect weakening buyer preference observed in the most recent two months of listings. Which USPAP requirement does this downward revision most directly satisfy?
Next Question
Two recently sold properties are nearly identical: both are 1,800-square-foot brick ranches on 0.25-acre lots, with updated kitchens and no garage. Comparable X has a screened porch (200 sq ft) and sold for $378,500; Comparable Y lacks a screened porch and sold for $369,900. The appraiser notes that both sales occurred in the same week, with no financing or seller concessions. What is the appropriate adjustment to apply to a subject property *with* a screened porch when using Comparable Y as the benchmark?