EstatePass
land-or-site-valuationhard

A comparable land sale was purchased by an adjoining owner completing an assemblage. How should the appraiser treat it?

Correct Answer

B) Consider whether the price included a plottage premium

Why this is correct: A sale to an adjoining owner for an assemblage may include a 'plottage' or 'assemblage' premium—an extra amount paid because the parcel has special value to that specific buyer for creating a larger, more valuable whole. The appraiser must analyze whether the price reflects this special buyer motivation before using it as a comparable for a typical market value assignment. Why the other choices are wrong: 'Use it directly, as it is a recent arm's length sale' is wrong; it may not reflect typical market value due to the special buyer. 'Exclude every sale involving an adjoining owner' is wrong; such sales can be used with analysis. 'Adjust it upward to reflect the assemblage benefit' is wrong; if a premium is present, you would adjust it downward for a typical sale. Exam tip: Sales for assemblage may reflect 'value in use' to a specific buyer, not general 'market value.' Look for a plottage premium.

Answer Options
A
Use it directly, as it is a recent arm's length sale
B
Consider whether the price included a plottage premium
C
Exclude every sale involving an adjoining owner
D
Adjust it upward to reflect the assemblage benefit

Why This Is the Correct Answer

Why this is correct: A sale to an adjoining owner for an assemblage may include a 'plottage' or 'assemblage' premium—an extra amount paid because the parcel has special value to that specific buyer for creating a larger, more valuable whole. The appraiser must analyze whether the price reflects this special buyer motivation before using it as a comparable for a typical market value assignment. Why the other choices are wrong: 'Use it directly, as it is a recent arm's length sale' is wrong; it may not reflect typical market value due to the special buyer. 'Exclude every sale involving an adjoining owner' is wrong; such sales can be used with analysis. 'Adjust it upward to reflect the assemblage benefit' is wrong; if a premium is present, you would adjust it downward for a typical sale. Exam tip: Sales for assemblage may reflect 'value in use' to a specific buyer, not general 'market value.' Look for a plottage premium.

Was this explanation helpful?

More land-or-site-valuation Questions

Under which condition is the land residual technique most applicable?

What is the appraiser's obligation when a site's legal description does not match its apparent physical boundaries?

Why can the same physical parcel carry different values in two assignments?

A site differs from land in that a site is best described as which of the following?

In a built-up area where no vacant land has sold for years, which approach to site value is the usual fallback?

How is entrepreneurial profit treated in the subdivision development method?

A land comparable sold 18 months ago in a market rising about 4 percent a year. What adjustment direction applies?

In a land residual analysis for a proposed office development, the appraiser estimates total annual net operating income (NOI) will be $1,250,000. The improvement value, derived via the cost approach, is $15,000,000. Market evidence indicates a 7.0% overall capitalization rate is appropriate for similar improved properties. What is the indicated land value?

A developer plans a 36-lot residential subdivision on raw land. Each lot is expected to sell for $85,000. Total development costs (excluding land) are $1,420,000, including $220,000 for entrepreneurial incentive. The developer requires a 12% annual yield on invested capital over a 3-year development period. Using the subdivision development method, what is the maximum price the developer should pay for the land if all lots sell at the projected price and timing?

In applying the land residual technique to a proposed subdivision, an appraiser estimates that the time required to fully absorb all lots will be 6 years. The developer requires a 10% annual yield on invested capital. Which discounting approach is most appropriate for converting future net proceeds to present value?

People Also Study

Practice More Appraiser Questions

Access all practice questions with progress tracking and adaptive difficulty to pass your Appraiser exam.

Start Practicing