A comparable closed nine months ago; public records show it, but the parties will not discuss terms. Before relying on it, the appraiser should:
Correct Answer
A) Verify what can be verified from other sources and weigh the sale accordingly
Why this is correct: Appraisers must attempt to verify sale data from available sources (e.g., public records, MLS, agents). A sale can still be used with appropriate weight reflecting the verification confidence level. Why the other choices are wrong: Using it at face value ignores the need for verification. Discarding every unconfirmed sale is overly restrictive and eliminates useful data. Assuming typical terms and marking it confidential is not a proper verification practice. Exam tip: Verification is a matter of degree; use partially verified sales with adjusted weight.
Why This Is the Correct Answer
When the parties will not talk, the appraiser still has the deed, transfer tax stamps, MLS history, listing brokers, assessor records, title company data, and commercial data services. Working those sources establishes what can be established, and the sale is then given weight proportional to the confidence that verification produced. This satisfies the diligence obligation without either overstating reliability or throwing away usable market evidence, and the report discloses the extent of verification so the reader can judge it.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B: Use it entirely at face value, since recording in the public record makes it official
Recording makes a transfer public, not accurate for appraisal purposes. A recorded price can include personal property, seller concessions, non-arm's-length family terms, or a portfolio allocation, and in non-disclosure states the recorded figure may be absent or nominal. Treating the record as self-verifying skips the entire cash-equivalency and conditions-of-sale analysis.
Option C: Discard every sale that cannot be fully confirmed
Discarding every sale that cannot be fully confirmed would strip out large portions of the available market evidence, especially in thin markets and in non-disclosure states where full confirmation is often impossible. The Standards ask for analysis of available data, not for perfect data. This option confuses rigor with rigidity, and it can leave the appraiser with too few comparables to support any conclusion.
Option D: Assume typical terms and mark the file confidential
Assuming typical terms without stating that assumption creates an undisclosed extraordinary assumption, and marking the file confidential addresses nothing about verification. Confidentiality governs how the appraiser handles client information under the ETHICS RULE; it is not a substitute for diligence. The option pairs a shortcut with an irrelevant procedural gesture.
Verify, Then Weigh
Two steps, always in this order: Verify as far as the available sources let you, then Weigh the sale according to how far you got. Verification is a dial, not a switch, and the dial position becomes the weight in reconciliation.
How to use: Whenever a stem says data cannot be fully confirmed, reject both extremes. The option that accepts the sale uncritically and the option that discards it outright are both wrong; the correct answer always involves partial verification plus proportional weight and disclosure.
Exam Tip
USPAP answers reward proportional professional judgment, so on verification questions eliminate any choice containing 'entirely,' 'every,' or 'at face value' before you read further.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- -Treating a recorded deed price as verified without checking for personal property, concessions, or non-arm's-length terms
- -Discarding usable comparables because a party to the transaction would not confirm the details
- -Failing to disclose the source and extent of verification in the report, leaving the reader unable to judge reliability
Concept Deep Dive
Analysis
This item tests verification of comparable sale data and the judgment that follows when verification is incomplete. USPAP Standards Rule 1-4(a) requires that when a sales comparison approach is necessary for credible results, the appraiser must analyze such comparable sales data as are available. The Standards do not require that every fact be confirmed by a party to the transaction; they require reasonable diligence and, under the reporting standards, disclosure of what was done. Verification is best understood as a spectrum rather than a switch: a sale confirmed by a party to the transaction is strong, a sale confirmed against MLS and deed records is moderate, and a sale known only from a recorded instrument is weak. The appraiser's obligation is to exhaust the reasonable sources and then let the confidence level drive how much weight the sale receives in reconciliation.
Background Knowledge
You need to know that Standards Rule 1-4(a) requires analysis of available comparable sales data and that the reporting standards call for summarizing the information analyzed. You should also be able to list the ordinary verification sources beyond the parties themselves, and understand that non-disclosure states make deed prices unreliable so secondary confirmation matters more there.
Real-World Application
An appraiser researching a nine-month-old industrial sale finds the buyer and seller both decline comment. The appraiser confirms the price against the deed and transfer stamps, pulls the expired MLS listing to check marketing time and any concessions, speaks with the listing broker, and reports the sale with a note that verification was limited to secondary sources, giving it less weight than two fully confirmed comparables.
More Sales Comparison Questions
Excess land differs from surplus land in that excess land:
A paired sales analysis reveals that homes with stainless-steel appliances sell for $2,100 more than identical homes with standard appliances — but only when the homes are priced below $350,000. In the subject’s neighborhood, median sale price is $410,000. What is the appraiser’s obligation regarding the $2,100 appliance adjustment?
GLA differs by 210 sq ft between subject and comparable. Paired sales support $65 per sq ft of living area. The line adjustment is:
Paired sales are drawn from transactions six months apart in a stable market. The time adjustment needed is:
The most appropriate unit of comparison is determined by:
A comparable superior to the subject in every adjusted category should produce an indication that is:
Three sales support $520,000; the borrower's purchase contract is $505,000. May the appraisal conclude above the contract price?
A comparable sold for $300,000 with the seller carrying a loan 2 points below market, a benefit worth $8,000. What is its cash-equivalent price?
Why is a foreclosure sale generally a poor comparable in a stable market?
A comparable sold 8 months ago for $250,000 in a market appreciating 6% per year. What is the time-adjusted price?
People Also Study
Real Estate Market
13.6% of exam
Property Description
11.8% of exam
Land or Site Valuation
4.5% of exam
Cost Approach
13.6% of exam
Income Approach
8.2% of exam